'59 *- " r - i PIROGr-ZRIESSI FI5{;l33E TEIOUG-HT! TJNTRAh£hl:B3LED IJ]:.V'1flE33 BREAI{ING THE TWAY FOR FUTURE GENERl£l1lIOi‘.2E§. Vol. XI.-—No. 12.—Wl;ole No. 272.- NEVV .YORK, FEB. 19, 1876. PRICE TEN CENTS. The truth shall make you free.-—Jesus. . In the clay/s of the voice of the seventh angel, the $.11/stery of God shall be jinvis/zecl.-—~St. John the 1v1ne. ‘ ‘ . Whe7'eof I was made a minister to preach the un- searchable riches of Christ, and the mystery which from the I)6((/'l'7?/I’l?'i7”tg of the world hath been hid in Gael.-—Paul. ~—~——4~+——%—-— _ “ WHAT SHALL I DO TO BE SAVED?” BY NELLIE L. DAVIS. A very pertinent question; for salvation is no myth, although it is not found in the orthodox fashion, nor yet is it found in any sense of the word until it is fairly earned. As uncompromising as the Abolitionists who refused to call this a free country, while the manacles clanked upon the limbs of one negro, so do we refuse a system of salvation which is incapable of ministering to the needs of every soul. The life which enfolds us physically may be properly termed the foundation of all life. Of the building erected thereon the superstructure is the intellect; the dome which crowns the whole is spiritual growth and perceptivity. Materialism compasses the needs of foundation and super- structure. Spiritualism en-wraps, the whole, from «dome to lowest foundation stone. Spiritualism is materialism, with the addition of a soul; it is Pygmalion waking to life his statue in the earthly clods insensate. Man in his threefold life, as a physical, intellectual, and spiritual being, has need of a threefold religious and social Culture. To ignore the one department of his existence for the other, is_the fatal mistake committed by most systems of religion. Materialism is the reaction of the perverted Spiritualism in the religious code of the middle and early centuries. The mediseval saint ignored his physical inheritance. His body was a huge excresence on his soul, to be burned, scourged, and fasted away in an earthly Valhalla of self- denial. To be a fleshless unincorporate soul was the very acme of existence. To be imprisoned in a body which knows hunger, thirst, disease, amative impulse, and death’s corruption, fretted the would-be saint with dire impatience of earth, its contingen- cies and associations. He answered the query: “ What shall I do to be saved?” throughshameful neglect and crucifixion of the basic principle of his being. The foundation being omitted, the intellectual and spiritual man was a starveling, where his physical imbecility was a success; where not, he was a hypocrite. _ _ By so much as he ignored the materialism of life, by so much was he incapacitated from prescribing a safe and speedy process of salvation from the sin of ignorance. V The theologic» plan of salvation says: “Take care of the soul and let the body take care of itself.” ' Materialistic salvation says. “Take care of the body and let the soul take care of itself ”——a decided improvement upon the old plan, but not covering the entire ground by any means. These systems are only twofold——the body expunged from the one, the soul from the other. The Spiritualistic salvation is threefold, and the one for which our organizations clamor the loudest, and will not be educated properly in all departments without. _ ‘ The law and order of salvation consists in the evolution from the scientific knowledge of the present, of a system of physical and spiritual growth that shall ripen every faculty of our-‘beings; that shall evolve perfect bodies f_or the ten- antry of pure souls; that shall redeem manhood, woman- hood and childhood from all abuses of the holy temple of God—the human body—by gross self-indulgence, by pamper- ing abnormal appetites until the lamp of life burns so low that it cannot longer resist these fitful gusts of morbid pas- sion, flickers a brief uncertain moment, then goes out for- ever, leaving the soul barren of rich results—-the carefully garnered wealth of a life well lived and replete with pure thoughts. puredeeds, pure loves. ’ Such is the salvation we all also for, but so many of us have weighed anchor on the sea of eternity fora life voy- age in such unwieldy, decayed and worthless vessels, that a wreck or premature termination of the voyage on the shoals or reefs of inherited disease, and mad passion, are the inevit. able I'6Bi1.1t5 Of. a large proportion of the voyages of life. ' ' -2s2.1r.A4~" v.<‘-:-;..-'_, " -;§so'u..;- . grade the sexual function; for he liveth poorly who loveth illy, a.-s.smum..,.- .'_,._,,.,«.»..-,,-_...,,,,,*,,.s .. ,.« » . Look to Jesus for your salvation, says the theologian. We have contemplated the cross for centuries; how much better are we, physically, because of such contemplation? Cross contemplation has afforded a leaning post for every morbid sluggard. Because one man has died for a truth, is no good and sufficient reason why we should die in him to any in dividual work for ourselves. - VVhen we trace the need of salvation back to its source, we find that the transgression of an inquisitive Adam and Eve’ has nought to do with its necessity, and that the crucifixion of the Jewish philanthropist is of no more avail to stem the tide of our ignorance, than is a child’s hand to stay the rush- ing torrent of Niagara. . Humanity has a chronic distaste for home truths, and the preacher has been popular in proportion as he steered clear of all unpleasant allusions, and confined himself to the story of salvation by the cross, omitting to mention thatthe cross has no remedial power for those who fail to work as well as 5 pray; popular so long as he did not urge brain and stomach salvation, and laid not a finger upon the veil shrouding the iniquitics of social life, and pretended not to see the grinning skeleton of excess peeping from the eye, seeking expression from the tongue, shadowing the life; popular so long as he did our thinking for us, and told us that ’twas good to be good for Jesus’ sake! As if, our lives were going to benefit a. man who has been dead for centuries, and who has left earthly things so far behind him that they-have become more motes in his memory, “and wl1o cares not a rush whether A eats meat or fish Friday, whether B keeps Saturday or Sun- day, or C believes or disbelieves the story of the immaculate conception! Clearly, salvation in its threefold character comes not by contemp lation of the cross. The most that has resulted from such contemplation is found in these enormous churches, useless six days out of seven, occupying the most elligible building sites, exempted from taxation, while rum shops, brothels, and the poverty- stricken but welltaxed homes of the laborers multiply so rapidly that crime and its parent poverty fill our prisons and almshouses to overflowing, and our highways and by- ways with predatory bands of tramps. If these churches could be used as reformatory insti- tutions to investigate the cause and cure of crime, they would be pre-eminently useful in abating hell upon earth, into which humanity ‘is plunged through its ignorance of this most important, but least understood, of all questions- sexual holiness, perfection of the human body, the living temple of God. We want a salvation that will offer a road out of all this misery and darkness that rivets closer the chains of earth’s famishing millions, and curses society with the fruits of debauched passion whose highest sentiment is selfish grati- fication. “ He prayeth best who loveth best; and_ he liveth well who loveth well,” are two axiomatic truths, whereby hangs the law of life. ‘ - To save ourselves from ourselves we must elevate, not de- and he. who degrades the coronal of being into animalism, commits the unpardonable sin, and while cursing posterity is eternally cursed himself by the recoil of his act. Phallic worship was the embodiment of an idea of physical per- fection and freedom from pruriency, toward the attain- ment of which we are struggling to-day. This idea, with us, will assume a diflerent expression than in its old time rendi-. tion, in accordance with the enlightenment and scientific research of the age. ’ We are jealous of our prerogatives as human beings above the brutes, and have not made good our claim by using those intellectual and moral‘ perceptions which have supplanted the fixed unreasoning instinct of the brute, to win salvation, and attain, at least, as healthy bodies and normal functions through intellect as the brute owes to instinct. At birth we are nothing, save in possibility Thus, we are left in a measure, free. As animals alone, we are inferior, because our instincts as animal, and our attributes as human, become so confused and untrustworthy, that to save our- selves from becoming the meanest objects on the face of God's footstool. we need to supplant them with something higher; ‘and we find that our only chance of gaining a useful and immortal existence consists in developing our- selves up to‘ that point for which we were designed-—-from ani- malism where we do not belong, up to Spiritualism, where we do belong. ’ ‘ _$/ Sexual salvation for the race is found in redeeming woman from centuries of serfdom, and selfish, woful subjection to tyrannous lusts; found in purifying our bodies; found in gaining a knowledge of our physical functions, their uses and the penalty of ‘their abuses; found in a heaven of freedom where each individual owns himself, and is not the bond slave of anothers’ will or whim. Womanhood fettered to the lowest, excluded from the highest, is the curse of the world, arousing the just anger of nature, from which, cross contemplation can never redeem us. For woman the three- fold salvation tarries and waits for its divine consummation in humanity, through the mothers of the race. Woman’s kingdom is the human heart, and she prayeth, ruleth and loveth well, when she has purified her kingdom of selfishness and lust by her determination to quell sexual impurity in lieu of pandering to its larger growth, by abdication of her rightful throne and relinquishment of her sceptre of power. The keynote of woman’s salvation as a physical, intellectual and spiritual being, is struck when she becomes a selfhood with a distinct identity from man, yielding allegiance, not to her husband, but unto her conscience and her God. Woman then becomes, not the reflex of man, but an individualized half of the basic principle of the unive1'se—-sex—each com— plete through thejnon-encroachment of the one upon the sphere of the other. Then human life shall attain its dl'\VlllQ perfection, crime and injustice shall disappear, and the Uni- versal Republic shall take the place of the corrupt demagog- ism that new rules thecountry to its ruin. . Man’s physical salvation is secured through woman's eman- cipation ; the degradation of the mother is the degradation of the children she bears. Take heed that the spring of life be pure, for if the fountain head bepoisoned, coming genera- tions bear the cross and mount the Calvary that lies in the pathway of violated physical and moral law. Spiritual salvation aims to strike at the cause; theology aims to strike at client. One tries to heal over the bites of the old serpent of ignorance; thenother tries to remove the serpent that no more may be bitten. VVe do not want to outwit hell and the devil by hiding be- hind a cross; for how well is the world healed to—day after a treatment upon this plan of nearly nineteen centuries! ‘ When a. person gets far enough along on the road of free in- quiry to ask why God don’t kill the devil, be sure he is on the high road to true salvation, for he will speedily find that the devil is his own ignorance, and that God intends that we shall slay our devils by educating ourselves into a knowledge and obedience of law, so that we may send forth no more half—made-up children that are no better than rabid dogs, to curse society, and make up our army of criminals, drunk- ards, prostitutes, paupers, imbeciles, tramps, and lunatics. Here are your devils: the abominations of ignorance. Slay them with the weapons of knowledge. Here is need of salvation; provide it from healthier bodies, better~balan,ced heads and riper souls. Exalt your physical functions above the slough of centuries of ignorant degradation and besotted passsion. Hold high the standard for manhood and Wtilllétll.- hood . Arise ye emancipated souls, and welcome the gist: new, era of a world’s redemption by the perfected typeof hu- manity, through the amalgamation of, and elimination from, the races, of the attributes and characteristics of each worth preserving and repeatin g. j ‘ The Millennial day draweth nigh; and how beautiful the thought that so many faces shall yet greet us through the salvation of "divine knowledge typified in the pictured divinity of face and form, the outcome of the purified and redeemed soul within. V Then, as on their natal day, shall the spheres chant the praise of the advent of 7a new race. Earth shall smile with a new gladness, and heaven will be found with gates wide open, not without, but within, the purified and redeemed soul of man. THAT “FINAL RECONCILIATION.” There certainly is to be a “finalreconciliation of all things” in spite of the quackeries, which in these latter days, have clustered around this phrase. The lion and the lamb shall lie down together; the Bismarcks, and the Pius Ninths and the Henri Delescluzes, shall meet in fraternal embrace. On the one hand,,there shall he the swords beaten into plow- shares. and the spears into pruning hooks; and on the other hand, the myriad seemingly contradictory doctrines that now divide men, hopelessly as one would say, shall have their u_n_-s WOODIIULL & CLAFLIN’B WEEKLY. Feb. 19, 1876. derlylng truths brought out into the clear day light, and be just so reconciled. On the one side, the “conservative spirit- ualism,” (whatever that may mean), with its “capital, la- bor’s best and only"friend,” its “superior sagacity,”t_aking “advantage of opportunities,” its “sweet by and by,” with its “millionnaire * * accounted as the benefactor of the race” ; on the other side, the “sell all that thou hast and give to the poor,” “that terrible‘camel’ business,” that “whip of ‘small cords,” with Dives roaring in hell and Lazarus sweetly reposing in Abraham’s bosom; and both sides having the truth,’the one side just as indispensable as the other. And yet, after all, truth is one; error, or What is the same thing, partial and one-sided truth, is alone divergent and contradic- tory. But no error was ever yet enunciated by human lips that had not a truth underlying it. ' How to eliminate the underlying truth. and so accomplish , that “ final reconciliation of all things,” for which all noble hearts, and synthetic minds have ever been longing, and striving, is of course just the question, To attain this un- ' derlying truth is simple, the same thing as to arrive at the genuine “universolgy,” or, to coin a better word for. the ‘hence, “pantology”—neither word, by the by, having any fur- ther utility when once the thing itself is attained. From that moment, the word "science”vserves amply; for the uni- versal doctrine resulting from the application to all possible categoriesof thought, of that method of positive demonstra- tion which finally solves every problem, solves it past all pos- sible recall, putting an end, at once for all, to doubt and un- certainty, in spite of all the “free thought” in the world; is thatwhich will most assuredly constitute the universal faith of the future, leading up the now scattered and mutually hostile races of men to the normal, oneness of humanity. But then we are met here, flnally by another divergence, another seeming hostility, one that looks at the first blush more profound then any above indicated. On one side stands inspiration; on the other side,science, or rather the sciences, the strange new gospel of dispersed specialism, the Spencer- Darwin—Tyndall-Huxley—Draper N ihilism, with the elec- tric telegraph flashing across an ocean and two continents its daily batch of lies, as a most fit symbol of its sovoreiguty! these two social forces—for such indeed they are, notwith- standing the anti——social propensities of the latter——are evi- dently now gathering themselves up for a final and decisive death struggle, the by-standers all feeling sure that one or the other must speedily succumb, be finally and definitively squelchcd, and to be no m ore heard of forever, save in the pages of curious history. And seeing that supernaturalism, from the very birth of science two thousand years ago in that little greek peninsula, destined to give intellectual light to a whole world, has been at every point, sooner or later- yes even when for special purposes it could secure itself a respite of a thousand years—forced to give way, and recog- nize the supremacy, in the sphere of pure intellect, of pos- itive demons_tration——these by-standers, Ii. (5. the freethinkers really free, come naturally enough to the seemingly unan- imous conclusion, that it is inspiration which has to go under, to pass away utterly and forever from among men. Only the very rare, really integral, minds, minds that can look at both sides and all sides of a great question, and not take for granted that the one side of the post facing the spot where they happen to stand is the whole post, can see-——and they will succeed, too, in finally demonstrating to to all mankind, along with the rest of normal universal doc- trine—that while supernaturalism has doubtless to give way to the all-conquering genius of positive science, that he in no way deprives inspiration of her own sphere. The conception of inspiration, like all other human conceptions, has doubt- less to undergo the transformation indicated in the law of the three states, the great universal law of progress. But it re- mains inspiration still. It is subject doubtless to immutable natural laws, which science,—the regenerated and unified science—has had to discover. But it is inspiration still, having its own function within its own sphere that can never be taken away. True enough the relations between science and inspiration are widely different from those that would be imagined by the pure inspirationist. But those who would pretend to systematize science while ignoring al- together the role of inspiration are clearly only quacks. A pretty science of history that would be, truly, that could not divulge the natural laws of a social force that has played such a part in the progressive development of our" race as has been played by inspiration! The play of Hamlet with the part of Hamlet left out would be consistency itself in comparison. RAMSHORN. AUDI ALTER AM PARTEM. NEW YORK, Jan. 19, 1876. Editors W eekZy~—-‘Having recently observed, by chance, N o. 10 of a published’ series of communications by one of our municipal Tax Commissioners on the subject of taxing church property, and as I consider your journal independent, and‘ not under any subsidizing influence, I would beg leave chiefly to note through its columns some of the remarks and proposi- tions of this wiseacre on church assessment or taxation. He begins by quoting Lord Chesterfield, who said: “A tax implies a license granted for the use of that which is taxed to all who would be willing to pay it.” Now, the matter of church taxation, in order to a proper understanding of it, does not require any Chesterfieldian authorities, but rests solely on the basis of common sense and reason. Our pilgrim progenitors came to this country to escape from the tyranny of an ecclesiastical government; their descendants,‘ the patriots of the Revolution, fought and bled to rid themselves of it, and the framers of our Constitution in that American Magna Oharta, knowing the consequent mischief and curse of such a mixture, very wisely inhibited all connections and en- tangling alliances between Church and State. This correspondent then goes on to state that the General Government, after imposing certain duties on all articles of luxury, has gone so far as distinctly to recognize the value of religious teaching by exempting from taxation and placing upon the free list, according to oificial interpretation, Bibles and other books i_mported in good faith for the use of Sunday schools in the United States, on adequate proof; and then asks what sense ‘there would be in exempting books used in such schools from duty and imposing a tax on buildings erected for the fostering of them.” According to such logic, if the existence of one thing be wrong then another wrong should of course be inflicted to make it sensible and just. While a Sunday school or a church may be a desirable insti- tution, per se, and productive of great good, it is not the province or duty of ou‘r”G-overnment to foster or aid either in any way, and the act, as the national records will undoubtedly show, was not voluntary on the part of the Government, nor by the expressed wish or will of the people, but “through petitions of those more immediately interested or concerned in the matter. And if our more modern law-makers preferred to stultify themselves by practising this little amenity ‘toward the Sunday schools it does not follow that a still further mix- ing—up of such things should be indulged in by compelling people of all beliefs a11d of no belief to contribute to the sup- port of the many and various religious and sectarian interests throughout the land to the amount of over $200,000,000. He admits that secular properties. to the amount of $2,500,000,000, are exempted by the United States Government. Well, one would’ naturally infer that this amount alone was about sufficient for tax—payers to look upon acquiescently without bearing additional burdens through any outside or extraneous causes. Then he says: “ The enormous amount of securities exempted by the General-Government owe their origin to war, and if Congress should enforce upon the States the tax- ation of buildings for public worship, great wonder would be expressed that, while such enormous sacrifice by exemption is offered to the Moloch of war, so small an cblation to the God of peace should be withheld.” The question: “ Who pays the taxes?” has time and -again been propounded and discussed, and the inevitable and correct answer has always been: “The poor man.” Yet, supposing this not to be the case, and the burden fell on all alike, for what purpose is it done by_any citizen but to support the Government under which he lives, and its established institutions? But is a church an established institution of our Government? By no means. How, then, would the whole people grudge an oblation to the God of peace by refusing to pay for the sup- port of a church, while they might be obliged by a natural law of self—protection to offer an enormous-sacrifice to the Moloch of war? The fact is, some people out—Christianize Christianity in their pretended religious enthusiasm. Then, too, there is so great a diversity of sects and denominations, how is "a disinterested citizen to know which one among them all is right? And what assurance has he that the sums which he thus pays, directly or indirectly, in the form of a tax, will be appropriated to a good and useful purpose? If there be any thing right about them it must be in some one of them. Christ’s body was not divided into so many parcels. Such divisions and subdivisions are all the result of priestcraft—— the work of doctors of ideas. True and unfeigned religion may be found in an open boat at sea, or in a wilderness, as well as in a grand and costly cathedral. It is not at all depend- ant on church conventionals. Indeed, in this age of corrupt and apostate christendom the real saints, compared with pharisees and hypocrites who make a trade of religion, and “ steal the livery of heaven " to gain an undue advantage of their fellow-beings, are like sparsely-scattered grains of wheat in a. mingled mass of chaff and rubbish. A man now- 'a—days may inwardly worship a golden god, with his heart and affections centered in worldly interests, and if he will say but Lord, Lo—r—d, and subscribe $100,000 to the erection of a costly Christian church, he will be supposed to have secured a through ticket to heaven in a palace-car. But God is not propitiated by any such works, the humblest hall or chapel being as acceptable in His sight as the most grand and gorgeous structure. A . When He said to His people, “Ye are the temple of the living God,” He didn’t have much reference to anything fashioned or finished with their hands. And when people think to be doing God service by selecting for church cere- monies or service, called worship, the most valuable plots of ground, and erecting thereon large and imposing edifices, gorgeously decorated and furnished to suit the fine apparel in which they are arrayed, they fall far short of the wisdom and comprehension of King Solomon, when, in his dedication of of the Temple, he exclaimed: “ The Heavenof Heavens can- not contain Thee, how much less this house which I have built! ” When in those days of types and symbols of the future, that temple of costly magnificence and grandeur was erected for sacred use, it was not intended by him, who designed it, to be a pattern of houses for the same purpose in subsequent times, but merely as a symbol of the beauty and purity that should characterize those living temples in which he would ever delight to dwell. Christ’s kingdom is not of this world; neither are his people. And a church body or ‘assembly that is truly devout and pious will not lack for anything essential tolits ,existence. But if it be chiefly made up _of those who have not sufficient faith, that He whosustains the universe will also not let them fall to the ground, and look to the world and the goverments of the world for protection and aid, they simply show that they are but sounding brass, and have only the form of godliness, without the power thereof. But there are plenty \such. When, therefore, Mr. Andrews denies that exemption of buildings for public worship is a concession, and insists that it is a right inherent in the conditions and uses of the prop- erty, he proposes what in the form of reason is the merest sophistry, and in the way of simple assertion, is nothing more than the sheerest and shallowest nonsense. His fitness. for beings. tax commissioner must, indeed, be surprising. Unscrupulous and persistent beggars for church privileges in the form of donations, exemptions, etc.,whether Protestant or Papal, are among the mostdangerous of frauds. Though possessing millions, their constant cry to the outside world is give; and they seldom. if ever say, hold, enough. It is such fanatical pharisees who are most opposed to taxation; most clamorous for an ecclesiastical government, or whatever may tend to a union of Church and State, and are ever acclaim- ing for the embodiment of the word God in the national Constitution. They make frequent and long prayers in pub- lic. and have always the words God and the Lordpin their months. If they would try to have more of such things in their hearts, without regard to the Constitution, they would, perhaps, find it ultimately much better for themselves, and not much, if any worse, for the Constitution, or for the people for whom it was framed.’ _ - I TAX Payne. REAPING. “Though the vision seems to tarry, Yet it surely will transpire; Though the battle seems eternal, And forever bums the lire, Suffer on, 0 ye faithful, For the end will surely come, And the fruits of all your labors, You will harvest to their home. In the yonder stormless regions, With an ever balmy sky, You shall soon receive a glory, Which can never, never die. Thenlet heaven kindly lead you, Through the river Jordan deep; And with calmness bear all chaslenin g, On this holy way to keep.” EI.i.rAn llirnrciai. Editors W echly :——The Jan. 22d number of your paper, con- taining the conclusion of an article under the caption, “A Critic Criticised,” has been received, but the previous paper containing the beginning of that article I have not seen. I perceive that you have been using me and an unfortunate article printed in my paper a short time since, as “shoulders” over which to Whip a great many people, and for that use no apology on your part is necessary. I am only too glad to have been of some possible good to the world. even in this way, and more for the purpose of giving you still further op- portunity to express your views by making myself a target to be shot at, than with the hope of advancing any new or important ideas, I take occasion to reply, promising, for your readers’ sakes, to be as briefas possible. Now, I admit that if society were so perfected in its parts and organization that the weak as well as the strong could feel sure of protection; if composed of members possessed of sufficient intelligence to comprehend the meaning of justice, and capable of reasoning correctly from causes to efiects; in short, a state of society in which it would be possible to live up to the precepts of the Golden Rule——then woman, in com- mon with all of the physically weaker portion of mankind, might freely trust in the wisdom. honorand generosity of man, or her fellows, to secure to her justice; and your the- oriesof freedom might be put in practical operation to great advantage. But such is not the case to~day. "He who holds the purse does hold the power, whatever other “ prize ” woman may have to sell, and to be sought for. Money is one of the prime necessities of our existence. It may be ranked next to air, since air is about the only desirable thing that can be had without it. Of course the possessors of it are, more or less, the autocrats of the world, and especially of the little domestic worlds that fill the world. You assert, and defy contradiction, that “ financial independence is impossi- ble for woman ” so long as a competitive system of industry prevails. This is my position exactly. Now, under existing cannot conceive of any independence worthy to be called‘ such, outside of financial independence; and as woman can- not have that, therefore, freedom for her is out of the ques- tion, since she cannot be free and at the same time depen- dent. Therefore, he who holds the purse holds the power. For this reason, it seems to me that a system of marriage by contract, which may be dissolved at any time by either party, is one which favors the man who “holds the purse ” very much more than it does the woman who is dependent upon that purse. He satisfies his desires, base or otherwise, and is at liberty to seek “fresh fields and pastures green.” She is faded and dispirited, cursed with physical diseases peculiar to her sex, which are augmented, perhaps. by_i1l— usage, and as a consequence——being a financial dependent and the weaker party in making the original marriage contract- there are no “fresh fields” for her. A beautiful flower, plucked and fondled, and, withering, she is thrown aside for another. In common with a worldful just like her, she must eat and drink and be clothed and housed. She has her free“- dom, however, and if she can find “the man to her liking,” she is free to form a matrimonial copartnership with him- providing he is willing. If she possess health, she has free- dom to commit suicide by the slow but sure process of drudgery, devised by the purse—holders for the extermination of both her body and soul. Hood"s “Song of the Shirt” illustrates’ this. She has jumped out of the frying~pan fairly into hell, but she has her freedom. Nor it does not mend the matter that old marriage contracts (“for better and for worse ”) would not be annulled by the new order of things, because the parties to the new contract come there under consideration, with woman at the usual disadvantage. Be it remembered that I am reasoning from the stand- point of the world, its men and its morals as it is, not as it might be or will be. Nor do I overlook the fact that agitation is necessary before purification, and that your ideas. which seem to me at present impractical, maybe the necessary forerunner of a better tlme to come. Indeed it is not difli- pated woman may be queen over herself, and bless the world by the use and exhibition of her full and developed capabil- ities, now scarcely known to ns;. but one glance out of the window at the. passers-byis -sufflcient to shatter all such heavenly dreams of bliss, and bring back all the dread reali- ties of the world as it is, with the discouraging multitude of reforms that mast precede, and wondrous growths that laws and customs, which must exist for a long time yet, I ' cult to imagine a social heaven-on-earth, in which emanci— . .. - = ~;~—- 1 I l ‘A ---la--.—-..... .- .——-..+-.'.- -.«,-....,.-«-4--—-—-~ {. —..~~<-~*—:'.i‘.‘;T'.f.’.T‘“'‘‘_~:~;;:; A . ._ _..-..-as ;=-..::-:~=;::~:-'.-1:. , . 2 . ,H\_ ,- 5.; - .,,.-_._-.- Feb. 19, 1876. WOODHULL & CLAF=~IiIN’S WEEKLY. must take place, before we can welcome in the grand eman- cipation day of woman and give to her that freedom which is her right. » I I seek the use of the Vl7EEKL‘Y' rather than my own paper for this, because it will reach a greater number who have read‘ your article; and while I do not pretend to have an- swered your arguments i_n full, I think this will relieve me from the imputation which you unintentionally cast upon me, of being of that numerous class of editors who thought- lessly malign you and the cause you are so ably defending. Very respectfully yours, LUCIEN V. PINNEY, WINSTED. CoNN., Jan. 14, 1876. Editor Wiinsteal Press. [We will not break the force of this graceful complimen by any attempt to reply to its arguments. _We will only refer our friendly editor to what we said, in the first article which he had not seen _when he wrote. We said if all women would rise together and throw off the yoke of sexual servitude, and hold out a month, that they could make any terms that they should demand, with their former masters, and hence it fol- lows that he who holds the purse, “ does not necessarily hold the pOwer;” he only holds it, because women will not together exercise the power which God -has given them for their defense against the opprcssors of their personal rights .] FLORENCE HEIGHTS, N. J ., Jan. 8. - Dear W eel.-ly-—A few lines to let you know I am buckling on the armor to prepare more vigorously for the fight. I am at Dr. Trall’s, attending lectures with my husband and child- ren. Cannot say too much of the system ; of Dr.9Trall him- self as an earnest, honest truth-seeker, and a daring teacher of the same. His Hygienic Home, on the banks of the Dela- ware,‘ twenty miles from Philadelphia, is a beautiful location. Here we are taught that to be true to one’s self is to be true to God; to be a Christian is to be a humanitarian; to take the world as our church and Nature for our creed is the highest ‘religion. Here we are taught. if we would be happy, we must be well, and if we would be well, we must obey the laws of health. Dr. Trall has long been condemned and scornedlb37Th73 _ medical faculty for his radical views on health reform. but his theories and principles will live long after he has passed from earth, because they are founded on the immovable laws of G-—od—Nature. Your readers may be desirous of knowing some of his eccentricities. His many valuable books explain much, ‘and they should be more widely known. He holds disease as a remedial effort, and as such should never be cured. Assist nature’ to its normal condition through the physiological agencies of air, exercise, water, magnetism, diet, etc., and she will restore herself. We here have two meals a day. Meats, salts, as well as all other condiments and spices. are excluded. A strict fruit and vegetable diet is required. We have two——sometimes three——daily lectures, two lyceums, and a dance weekly; gymnastics daily. Dr. Trall fears not to call things by their right names, and place people in their right pews. Six male prostitutes to one female, was the assertion made yesterday. He fully agrees with you that the blood flow in menstruation is disease. The ovum should ripen and (pass without pain, and not only con- clusively proves it by nature (as he does every statement), but we see it demonstrated here by women ‘coming and living strictly hygienic. The flow entirely ceases, and they improve in health. Just now the doctor is giving us some extra lectures, by request. His views on theology—-rich, deep and abiding. God bless Dr. Trail, with you, dear Victoria, and many more of our modern Savlours, till they see the fruits of their labor Let me, too, offer aword of cheer to Mattie Strickland. GO on brave girl; be true to self and you can but be true to God. I wept over your sorrow, but rejoiced over your noble test of womanhood. Would there were more possessing your courage. C ANNA ATWATER. [Dr. Trail is the author of a work on “Sexual Physi(- logy,” which we will send post-paid to any address, on re- ceipt of $2. Eds. WEEl{LY.] . C A I h . NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 1876. Editor Woodhull and Olafl'in’s Weekly: , I think Mrs. Woodhul1’s lectures are practically true, and go to the bottom of the evils of society. The church, as at present constituted, is lopping off the branches of the great tree of evil, while Mrs. Woodhull is going down to the foundation, and digging up the tap roots. I can see no reason why society has not as good a. right to prevent criminals,lpaupers and lunatics from propagating as society has to support and take charge of them after they are propagated. ' In my view no criminal, diseased person, lunatic, idiot, or pauper ought to be permitted to propagate their species. The course which society pursues in this respect is a disgrace to the race, and an outrage upon the.Divine Being. If the true history of all the idiots and deformed children could be correctly ascertained, it would be found that one or both ofthe parents was directly responsible for these diffiul- culties. Many children are made idiotic and permanently deformed by the efl"ort,s of the mother to destroy them in em- bryo. The fearful question of foeticide is taking hold of the minds of the people, and it will have to be met squarely be- fore long. , ‘We want the facts laid bare in these cases, so that the pub- lic can see who is responsible. I It should be-considered a reproach to a woman to have a deformed child. A healthy sentiment of this description would have a tendency to stem the tide of degradation which is nowcarrying the race toward the quicksands of total ex- tinctioii. The people wantichristianity made practical. Theology is alfltheoretical. Christ healed, the bodily infirmities of all whose sins He forgave. The most important part of the mission of the Apostles was to heal the sick. A Salvation of the body was what Christ principally taught. All His teachings go to show that He came that we might have life, and that whosoever believed in Him should not perish. I believe in Christ as a physical Saviour. “ Ithink the time is not far distant when the great mass of the world will believe in this idea of salvation. ' — ' ' I can only bid you God speedin the work you‘are doing. Yours truly, E. P. MILLER. AN INQUISITOR AT NEW HAVEN. 7. .Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten, who is lecturing in this city before the Free Lecture Association, took occasion. in reply to a question, to pay her complimentsto Mrs. Woodhull and to that large and increasingclass Of thinkers who agree with her on the social question. She said ‘_‘ it was the dis- grace of the age that speakers should be permitted to travel through the country and teach such abominable doctrines”- meaning, of course, the doctrines of Mrs. Woodhull-at which a crowd in the back part of the hall, which had several times interrupted the meeting, stamped and applauded, the Spirit- ualists and Liberalists present preserving an ominous silence. ‘We cannot imagine a better co-adjutor of Comstock, the Y. M. C. A., and the hosts of bigotry, than Mrs‘. Britten. She denounced atheists, she sneered at “reason,” she quoted judging from her remarks, the social reformers would be arrested, and all free speech on the most momentous ques- tions of the hour stifled. What a liberal is this Mrs. Britten who can talk transcendental vagaries for two hours without hardly taking breath,’ and who would prevent, by force, a noble and glorious woman from declaring the grandest truths that were ever uttered by human lips! - I Be assured, Mrs. Britten, and all would-be liberal popes and spiritualistic inquisitors, that you will not succeed. Spiritualism will have no pontiifs, either in pantaloons or petticoats, to dictate beliefs and crush out freedom of con- science and speech. BRUNO. A PETITION FOR GREENBACKS. Eclilors Wee7ély:—The workingmen of this city have pre- pared the following Petition to Congress. Please to publish it and request all those who are friendly to copy it, or some- thing similar. obtain all the signatures they can, and send the petition to Hon. Peter Cooper (Cooper Union, New York City), for presentation to Congress. What we want is that our friends should get up petitions for legal tender money, to be issued by the Government-‘V sufficient) quantities for the needs of the people. WM. A. A. CARSEY, 402 W. 51st st., City. THE PET1TION_OF THOSE WHO LIVE BY HONEST LABOR. To the Senate and House of Representatives in Congress As- sembled. - Your petitioners respectfully represent-—— ~ 1. That they believe that a large part of the suffering which prevails among the industrial classes, by reason of their non- employment, has been caused by a mistaken financial policy of the Government; , e 2. That two kinds of currency for any nation are incom- patible with the public interest, and are a certain cause-of misfortune; — ‘ 3. That the circumstances that seemed to make it neces- sary to authorize National Banks under the present system passed away with the war; 4.. That the National Bank currency is a costly currency to the people, inasmuch as it ensures the banks two interests; first, on their bonds, and second, on their currency which they receive for their bonds while deposited with the Gov- ernment; 5. That the currency best adapted to the interests of in- dustry, is that issued by the Government, which should be made receivable for all dues. — We therefore respectfully ask that your honorable bodies will pass a law providing for the retirement of the National Bank currency, and for the issue of United States Treasury Notes to take its place,:and for this we will ever pray. A 4 f 'wr'—* MRS. WOODHULL IN THE FIELD. COMMENTS OF THE PRESS. (From the Tribune, J ohnstown, Pa. J an 22, 18.76.) The lecture delivered by Mrs. Woodhull in the Opera House last night was thoroughly. enjoyed by the ladies and gentlemen present. She is a rapid, yet clear and distinct talker,'and possesses a richly—modulated voice, which is ex- ceedingly pleasing to the listener. There were many home truths spoken last evening by this lady in such an impres- sive manner as to touch the hearts of her audience, and the close attention with _which her discourse of an hour and a- quarter was received showed that it was highly appreciated by all present. . (From the Democrai, Johnston, Pa. Jan 22, I878.)