Woodhull, Victoria C. (Victoria Claflin), 1838-1927, Cook, Tennessee Claflin, Lady, 1845-2004
Publisher
Victoria C. Woodhull and Tennie C. Claflin
Date
1874-01-31
Place published
New York (N.Y.)
Text
i 12>ROGrREssz FREE THOUGHT! UI\‘rTRAMMEL:ED LIVES: » A BREAKING THE WAY FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS. , i ,. , V01. VII.———No. 9.——Who1eNo. 165:. >» . THE LOANER S BANK OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, (ORGANIZED UNDER STATE CHARTER,) Continental Life Builing, 22 NAssAU STREET, NEW YORK. CAPITAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $500,000 Subject to increase to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1,000,000 This Bank negotiates LOANS, makes COLLEC- TIONS, advances on SECURITIES and receives DE- POSITS. Accounts of Bankers, Manufacturers and Merchants will receive special attention. @“’ FIVE PER CENT. INTEREST paid on CUR RENT BALANCES and liberal facilities offered to our CUSTOMERS. DORR RUSSELL, President. A. F. WILMARTR. Vice-President. JOHN J. OIsoO & SON, ‘Bankers, \ No. 59 Wall St., New York. Gold and Currency received on deposit nbject to check at sight. , Interest allowed on Currency Accounts at the rate of Four per Cent. per annum, credited at the end of ... Show morei 12>ROGrREssz FREE THOUGHT! UI\‘rTRAMMEL:ED LIVES: » A BREAKING THE WAY FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS. , i ,. , V01. VII.———No. 9.——Who1eNo. 165:. >» . THE LOANER S BANK OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, (ORGANIZED UNDER STATE CHARTER,) Continental Life Builing, 22 NAssAU STREET, NEW YORK. CAPITAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $500,000 Subject to increase to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1,000,000 This Bank negotiates LOANS, makes COLLEC- TIONS, advances on SECURITIES and receives DE- POSITS. Accounts of Bankers, Manufacturers and Merchants will receive special attention. @“’ FIVE PER CENT. INTEREST paid on CUR RENT BALANCES and liberal facilities offered to our CUSTOMERS. DORR RUSSELL, President. A. F. WILMARTR. Vice-President. JOHN J. OIsoO & SON, ‘Bankers, \ No. 59 Wall St., New York. Gold and Currency received on deposit nbject to check at sight. , Interest allowed on Currency Accounts at the rate of Four per Cent. per annum, credited at the end of each month. ALL CHECKS DRAWN ON US PASS THROUGH THE CLEARING-HOUSE, AND ARE RECEIVED, ON DEPOSIT BY ALL THE CITY BANKS. Certificates of Deposit issued, payable on demand, bearing Four per Cent interest. Loans negotiated. Orders promptly executed for the Purchase and Sale of Governments, Gold, Stocks and Bonds on commission. Collections made ‘\on all parts of the United States and Canadas. HARVEY FISK. A. s. Rnrron - OFFICE 013' EIsK & HATOH, ‘BANKERS AND DEALERS IN f GOVERNMENT SECURITIES, No. 5 Nassau st., N.‘Y., @ Opposite ’U. S. Sub-Treasury. We receive theaccounts of Banks, Bank- - ers, Corporations and others, subject to check at sight, and allow interest on balances. VVe make special arrangements for interest on deposits of specific sums for fixed periods. We make collections on all points in the United States and Canada, and issue Certifi- cates of Deposit available in all parts of the Union. . We buy and sell at current rates, all classes of Government Securities, and the Bonds of the Central Pacific Railroad Company ; also, Gold and Silver Coin and Gold Coupons. We buy and sell, at the Stock Exchange, miscellaneous Stocks and Bonds, on commis- sion, for cash. Communications and inquiries by mail or telegraph, will receive careful attention. 1 rise: a EATCE, ’ . seeeas;ss:e Asa sane vb >- ~... NEW YORK, ;_. ~ JAN. .81, 1874. Dr. 0. A. BARNES, llaair 1131111113, 706 Ll/V. MONROE STREET Chicago, in. This Institute, organized uponthe, combined prin- ciples of Magnetism and Medicine, makes a specialty of alllhose diseases which, by the Medical Faculty, are considered incurable. Among these maybe mentioned Paralysis, Scroiula, Rheuma- tism, Dyspepsia, Epilepsy, Neuralgia, Chronic Di- arrhoea, Diseases of the Live“, Spleen and Kidneys, and especially all Diseases Peculiar to Women. In this last class of complaints, some of the most extraordinary discoveries have recently been made, which surmount the diflicultics that have heretofore stood in the way of their cure. _ The peculiar advantage which the practice at this . Institution possesses over all others is,that in addition to all the scientific knowledge of Medical Thcr.-xpeu tics and Remedial Agents which the Faculty have, it also has the unerring means of diagnosing diseases through CLAIRVOYANCE, as well as the scientific administration of ANIMAL and SPIRITUAL MAGNETISM in all their various‘ forms. This combination of remedial means can safely be relied upon to cure every disease that has not already destroyed some vital internal organ. No matter how Often the patient affected in chronic form may have failed in obtaining ‘relief. he should not despair, but seek it from 1his, the only Institution where all th various methods of cure can be combined. ‘ t In addition to the cure of disease, Clairvoyant con- sultations upon all kinds of business and upon all‘ forms of social affairs can also be obtained. Sealed letters answered. Reception hours from 9 A. M. to 5 P. M. Invalids who cannot visit the Institute in person can apply by letter. Medicine sent to all parts of the world. I All letters should be addressed Dr. C. A. BARNES, Healing Institute, 706 W. Monroe Street, ‘ CHICAGO, ILL. The Serra tuesiitn The Money Power. How shall flvis Power be. made to S67"D6, inszfead of 9’ult'ng us : A Lecture delivered by Lois Waisbrooker, at J ack- son, Mich, Dec. 14, at the Annual Meeting of the State Association of Spiritualists, and published by request. ' “ Sister Lois-—I am glad to see, in the last number of Our Age, the names of so many who desire you to pub- lish your Lecture delivered in Jackson, December 14. Add my name to the list of supplicants. Your ideas upon the money power, how it can be made to serve, instead of ruling us, are grand beyond a mortal’s tell- ing. The Lecture was deep, logical, argumentative," and should be sent broadcast over the earth. “M. L. SHERMAN, M. D. ,“ ADRIAN, M1011." vPrice. 15 can copy: 10 cents if.seng by the dozen. ‘ 'T‘ssu6v.E‘ FROM PARIS, ILL., TO NEW YORK, Tl-li Infill-setter, A fearless, outspoken Monthly, devoted; to Science, Morals, Free Thought, Liberalism, Sexual Equality, Labor Reform, and whatever tends to elevate and beneiit the Human Race; . OPPOSED TO Sectarianism, Priestcraft, Dogmas. Q1'e€dS, Sl1l9,31" stition, Bigotry, Aristocracy, Monopolies, OP/l31“3i351°“ of all kinds, and everything that burdens or ens aves liianleind mentally or physically. O ‘ — On January 1st, 1874-, it will be doubled in size to a A FULL SHEET. Terms, $1 per year dating ‘from _the enlargement; or 75 cents a year, c’Ommen’c1ng with N0. 1; and 1”‘ cluding the four numbers already issued. ~ To each Subscriber will he mailed_EREE, as a pre- mium, avalu-able fifty‘-cent Book, entitled "‘ CHILDHOOD OF THE WORLD,” by EDWARD CLODD, F. R. S., being a reprint from a late English editron._ It gives a succinct and_instruc- tiveaccount of Man in the Early Ages, and IS admi- rably adapted to the comprehension of young and old. Those friendly to the objects and purposes or. THE TRUTH-SEEKEE are respectfully requested to given their support and encouragement. Sample copies free to applicants. Send one-cent stamp to pay postage. .' 1). M. BENNETT, Editor and Proprietor, aided by ‘a. corps of able contributors and correspondents from among the leading minds of the country. Address Box 1654, New York. BANKING & FINANCIAL. A THE ST. JOSEPH AND DENVER CITY RAIL- ROAD COMPANY ’S FIRST MORTGAGE BONDS Are being absorbed by an increasing demand for them. \ Secured as they are by a first mortgage on the Road, Land Grant, Franchise and Equipments, combined in one mortgage, they command at once a ready market. A Liberal Sinking Fund provided‘ in the Mortgage Deed must advance the price upon the closing of the loan. Principal and interest payable in com). Inter- eat; at eight (8) per cent. per annum. ‘Payable. semi- annually, free of tax. Principal in thirty years. De- nominations, $1,000, $500 and $100 Coupons, or Regis- tered. / Price 97,14 an accrued interest, in currency, from February 15, 1872. . Maps, Circulars, Documents and nished. 'I‘ruste,es, Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company of New York. Can now be had ‘through the principal Banks and information fur- Bankers throughout the country, and from the under-. signed who unhesitatingly recommend them. TANNER & co., Bankers, No. 11 Wall Street, New York. AUGUST BELMONT & CO, ,:B&IIlK@,I‘S, 191 and 21 NAssAU sTREET, Issue Letters, of Credit to Travelers, available 111 all parts of the world through the MESSRS. DE ROTHSCHILJ) AND 'I.HEIR OORRESPONDENTS. . Also.re.alzete1e,r;rran1ae teenagers at srsisstssreas and saves . “ 3 /. /. PRICE TEN CENTS. FRAIIROAD IRON, EOE sALE BY s. W. HOPKINS & CO-., M71 BROADWAY TOLEDO,rEo:it.i‘..A WARSAW RAILw'ri;r,, SECOND MORTGAGE CON.- VERTIBLE '7 PER, OENT. OURRENEY ReNDs. INTEREST f,WARRANTS‘ PAYABLE OOTOBER AND APRIL, PRINCIPAL 1886, block. By act of reorganization of the Company these bonds are convertible into the First Preferred Shares of the Company, which amounts to only 17,000 shares, and into the Consolidated Bonds. (recently negotiated at Amsterdam) of six millions of dollars, which cover tn entire line of‘ ‘:50 miles of completed road, to the value of more than ten millions of dollars. The road crosses the entire State of Illinois and connect I with the mammoth iron bridges spanning the M551 5 sippi at Keokuk and Burlington. The income of the road for the year will net suflicient to pay interest on ferred shares. For terms apply g A Chaise, contra a e., we sense. A ‘ ' 1» —.—-M" ‘ -av" We oife/r for sale $1oo,ooo_ of the above bonds in I gether with ‘allthe rolling stock and real property, to . all the bonded hidebtednéss and "dividend on the pres‘ "N .._. .9 ‘ V 7 ‘,5 v.1«»,n" 27 _ / , " INOODHULL J5 CLAFLIN’S WEEKLY. ’ Jan. 31, 1874. The spit-iaiai Mystery ,7 “The Ngv eta,” Is in its third thousand, and revolutionizing human thought on Spiritualism. It will be mailed for 60 cents. I It contains what can nowhere else on earth be found. Address, . Kate V. corson, Toledo, Ohio. THE PROGRESSIVE COMMUNITY, Cedarvale, Howard 00., Kansas, Desire correspondence with persons wishing for a Community home. , Address (inclosing stamp) J. G. TRUMAN, Secretary. iihceiit, Radical Eoadiiio‘. ‘The Essence of Religion-. . GOD THE IMAGE OF MAN. Man’s Dependence upon Natuiethe last and only source of /R’-iligion. ' Translated from the German of Ludwig Feuerbach, by Prof. A. Loos. 12:210. cloth, $1; paper, 60 cents. _ . ]W€€i6T"i6tl73S?n ,- Its Ancient History, its Recent Development, its Prac- tical Beneficence. By Dr. L. Buechner, author of “Force and Matter,” “Man in Nature,” etc., etc. Ti'anslated from the au- tlior’s manuscript by Professor A. Loos. 25 cents. The Childhood of the Woz°lrl ; , A Simple Account of Man in Early Times. By Edward Clodcl, R. A. S. 12112.0. Paper, 50 cents. Cloth, '75 cents. . The Religion of Ifmnmwity. By 0. B. Frothingliam. Second Edition, with Fine Steel Portrait. 12mo, cloth. Price $51.50. Oiem'st<£a%73tvy cmd Jifatemictwsm, Con- ~ twisted. By B. F. Underwood. A handsome forty-five page pamphlet. 15 cents. ‘MR. UNDERWOOD’S BEST LECTURE, The Influence of Clevcistianéty on Ctvileettttozz. V Eighty-eight page pamphlet. Price 25 cents. The Reltgeozz of Iniiunutiettr . A caustic criticism of “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.” By Frederic Harrison. Price 20 cents. Leettwe on Bctdelhtst Néizeltsrre. By Prof. Max Mueller, Translated from the German. A brilliant defense of Buddha. Price 10 cents. The Relation of I/Vétchewtft to Re- lc'gc’on. _ By A. C. Lyall. Price 15 cents. ' A Postttotst Pr/meet". , A series of Familiar Conversations on the Religion of Humanity, dedicated to the only Superior Being man can ever know, the great but imperfect God, Human- ity, in whose image all other gods were made, and for whose service all other gods exist, and to whom all the children of men owe Labor, Love and Wor- ship. Price’ '75 cents. The Truth About Love ,- A Proposed Sexual Morality, based upon the Doc- trine of Evolution, and Recent Discoveries in Med- ical Science. Price $1.50. Any of the above books sent free by mail upon re- , ceipt of price. Asa K. BUTTS 85 CO., 30 Dey Street, . New York. DENTAL Norioa. , Address, DR. AMMwIwBRO‘VVN,, HAS REMOVED To I25 West Fortyvseeond St, Between Broadway and Sixth Avenue, NENV YOEJIK. ’ ’ Call and see me; afriendly chat costs you nothing, TWENI )7 YEARS’ PEA OTIUE. , Liberalist and Social Reformer, would prefer a situa- tiou with one _of similar _views. . Address, Thomas Carter, 316 New street, Philadelphia, Pa. DR. PERKINS Can be consulted as usualat his oflice, , MIDDLE-AGED MAN BEING OUT of employment, would like a situation. , Being a NO. 9. FIFTH STREET (South Side), OPPOSITE PUBLIC SQUARE, KANSAS CITY, MO.,. , Orby mail, box 1,227, on the various symptoms of Pri- vate Diseases. The afflicted will take notice that I am the only man on the American continent that can cure you of Spermatorrhoea, Loss of Manhood, etc., caused by self abuse or disease. I challenge the combined medical faculty to refute the above statement by suc- cessful eoinpetition. The symptoms ‘Of disease pro- duced by nightly seminal emissions or by excessive sexual indulgence, or by self abuse are as follows: Loss of memory, sallow countenance, pains in the back, weakness of limbs, chronic costiveness of the bowels, confused vision, blunted intellect, loss of con- fidence in approaching strangers, great nervousness, fetid breath, consumption, parched tongue and fre- quently insanity and death, unless combated by scien- tific medical aid. Reader, remember Dr. Perkins is theonly man that will guarantee to cure you or refund the fee if a cure is not permanently made. Also re- member that I am permanently located at No. 9 Fifth street. S. S., Opposite the public square, Kansas City M0,, and I have the largest medical rooms in the city. and all is strictly confidential. Post box, 1,227. DR. PERKINS, Kansas City. Mo. EW YORK CENTRAL AND HUD- SON RIVER RAILROAD.-Commeneing Mon- day, J une 23, 1873. Through Trains will leave Grand Central Depot—— . »' _ 8:00 A. 1\(., Chicago and Montreal EXpl‘eSS,‘,Wil',h drawing-room cars through to Rochester and St. Al- bans. ' ‘ 9:00 A. M., Saratdga Special Express. 10:00 A. 181., Special Chicago Express, with drawing- room cars to Rochester, Buifalo, &c. 10:45 A. M., Northern and Western Express. 3:40 P. M., Special Express for Albany, Troy and Saratoga, commencing Saturday, 21st inst. , 4 :00 P. M., Montreal Express,‘ with sleeping cars from New York to St. Albans. _ _ , 7:00 1*. 11., Express, Daily, with sleeping cars for. Watertown and Canandaigua. . ' 8:30 P. M., Pacific Express, Daily, with sleeping cars from Rochester, Buifalo and Niagara Falls; also for Chicago, via both L. S. and M. C, Railroads. 11 :00 1’. M., Express, with sleeping cars for Troy and Albany. _ 2:00 P. 11., Hudson train. _ _ 7:00 A. M., and 5:30 P. M. ,\Poughkeepsie trains. - 9:10 A. M., 4:15, 6:20 and 7:45 P. M., Peekskill trains. 5:00 1». 11., Sing Sing train. Tarrytown trains from 30th Street Depot, stopping at all Stations, leave at 6:45, 8:25 and 10:20 A. M., 1:00, 3:00, 4:00, 4:40, 5:15, 6:30, 8:00 and 11:30 P. Sunday Way Trains—For Tarrytown, from 30th street, at 8:25 A. 161., and 1:00 1’. M. " For Poughkeepsie, from 4th avenue and 42d street Station, 9:10 A. M. _ C. II. KENDRICK, General Passenger Agent. Charles. Br>adlaugh’s Paper, WM. DIBBLEE, LADIES’ HAIR DRESSER, 854 BROADWAY, Has removed from his Store to the FIRST FLOOR, where he will continue to conduct his business in all its branches TWENTY-FIVE PER CENT. CHEAPER than heretofore, in consequence of the diiference in his rent. ’ CHATELAINE BRAIDS, LADIES’ AND GENTLEIV/[EN"S WIGS. and everything appertaining to the business’ will be kept On hand and made to order. DIBBL}x.\Q\NIA for stimulatin , JAPONICA for soothing am. the MAGIC TAR SA VE for promoting the growthoi the hair, constantly on hand. Consultation on diseases of the Scalp, Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, from 9 A. M. till 3 P. M. ‘ Also, his celebrated ‘ HARABA ZEIN, or FLESH BEAUTIFIER, the only pure and harm- less preparation ever _made for the complexion. No lady should ever be without it. Can be obtained only at WM. DIBBLEEPS, 85 Broadway, Up-stairs. Publications of 7’VoLlt_ IVhétmom, the Greottestof Poets. LEA$VES OF GRASS. New Edition. 504pp. . 3 -. AS A ‘STRONG BIRD ON PINIONS FREE. Just ~ out. '75 cents. ’ DEMOCRATIC VISTAS. '75 cents. Also a few copies of John Burroughs’ NOTES’ ON‘ WALT WHITMAN AS POETAND PERSON, $1. Address A. K. BUTTS & CO., 36 Dey st., New York. AGENTS WANTED For our Radical and Reform Publications. Great in- ducements. Catalogues sent on application, with stamp to pay postage. Political Essay. Prose, ASA K. BUTTS & C0,, 36 Dey st., New York. THE‘ ‘ "‘,Victor” S. lii. Co.’s NEW’ SEVVING MACHINE 6% Runs very Easy. Ruins very Fast, Rurrsvery Still. HAS A NEW SHUTTLE sr7PER.ioR T O 1" ALL OTHERS. G Defies Competition. SP»-IRITUALHISM. ALL ABOUT %ci-than sores The Wonderful Medium. The compiler of this work, George 0. Bartlett, says. in the introduct-.iOn: “While making an extended G-REAT IMPROVEMENTS IN _, NEEDLE. I Cannot -be Set 'VV1°ong. I A GENTS’ WANTED. Address The “VICTOR.” S. M. CO. 862 Broadway, N. Y. tour through the principal cities of the United States with Mr. Foster, I made it my especial business to in- vite the editors of the principal newspapers and jour- nals to investigate the phenomena as they occurred in ness and justice of the editorial corps throughout the country, and believing that they would give truthful accounts of their experiences during the seances, I have in this little pamphlet republished a series of ai;- ticles from the leading papers of the Union. The reader must bear in mind that in nearly every case these articles have been written by men who are op- posed to Spiritualism. In some instances, we are com- pelled to say, that on account of the un-pOpulari' of the cause in some quarters, it was deemed ine edi- ent by the writers to give the m.ore incredil“ ' and startling occurrences as they were witnessev Not- withstanding this, this little volume is put f .3 .h with the hope that it may lead persons to investigate these phenomena, who, unbelieving now, may be led to be- “ THE NATIONAL IIEFORMER.” AGENCY IN AMERICA. Asa K. Butts & Co. take pleasure in announcing that by recent arrangements with M1‘. Bradlaugli they be- come agents in America for the sale of all the Pamph- lets an other Works of Brewllaugh,Ifolyoake, Watts, And other celebrated English Free-Thinkers. A full supply of which is expected to reach us next month: and are also authorized to receive sub- scriptions for THE NATIONAL REFOEMER, A Secular Advocate and Free-Thought Journal. Edited by CHARLES BRADLAUGH. Price, post-paid, $3.50 per year; single copies, 10 cents. Address, ASA K. BUTTS & C0., lieve in a spiritual life. This accomplished, it will not go forth in vain.” Price 50 cents, postage free. ,_ For sale, wholesale and reiail, by COLBY & RICH, at NO. 9 Montgomery Place, Boston, Mass. THE ESSAYS READ BY 0. B. Iilrotli/inglzam, E. L. Yozm/Lmzs, AND OTHERS, Before the meeting of the Bee Rellglsiis tssstlsiicii, Held in Cooper Institute, New York, Oct. 14, 15 & 16. In pamphlet form, 35 cents. reports.) Address the Publishers, ASA K. BUTTS 85 CO.. John Weiss, James Pm-ton, 36 Dev st., New York. 36 Dey st., New Yo Mr. ‘Foster’s resence. Having confidence in the fair-_ Elairvyani lviedleal Practical Dr. StOrer’s Ofliee, (Formerly (M137 Harrison Ave), Is now in the beautiful and commodious Banneitof Light Building, No. 9 MONTGOMERY PLACE, _ ’ BOSTON. streets. _ MRS. MAGGIE A. FOLSOM. patients from nine—O’clock a. m., to five o’clock_p. m., daily. v 9 DR. STORER will personally attend patients, and whatever spiritual in sight and practical judgment and experience can accomplish will be employed as here- tofore in curing the sick. Patients 12* the country, and all persons ordering (F,0,,, the T,,,,b,,,,,, Dr. STC-REl{“¢:‘ NEW VITALREMEDIES for chi-oni*c and Nervous -/useases, will address Dr. H. . Storer, :* 0. 9 Montgomery Place, Boston § . . "’ "‘H Z ' ‘ D eggs 3 51:3’ EEEE gs ego :\ f?,,vg__ egg; ‘,5; Sims: Q ,3 "eo~<*";as=a>a,.; PTE'° In q3"’.gEp"-'-Hp‘ 5mg 3‘ 1-«gd no 8 aapdweg §:,a§b‘E:5'E.°° r:”’é‘§ ‘4 ~ 594 gz:'o§mg‘oaaE';;-l=I"s9Hl=‘l=' B'o°a>€B§°»-3 o"-“ o O o 0 F’o::<pg°o.on»-;oa>~°oca an--.5‘ °’Ulr.1¢ wires: 5 H. r-:<1>: Ho.-3 l5;;,;:-(D rv-Cg m ¢..O-1:159? ‘°‘l€€P. - “ “ E‘-Vi‘ §:e.r-*9’83’- aa~.’9t*Es*d-? ‘?7="~’-‘*°»<=*. 3 ago -“ 9-’ 9.s=r=r ¢‘¥5E‘.::§3Q¢="5§“".':+'I=<L‘I"" sv“”’g-83-o5 .. ,€5:‘5'§ E9 :2‘-$3 °v”;r‘a'ss.~E‘r.%’s‘s'-22-E sa:,:.=..2gs.~ car: :24 OFF»: <T?ca>--9'0 ‘<1°”'9_. <‘>F‘o§g..,s>,,,.;‘, §*Emc> F1 to *’ 9° “[11 9’l'J$"I'.'l3H "" 0° 3E_ “'13 co amen 133%! '3 ’‘'--+«gwHOm ca” 3'. °'mg 6- bopd Q _¢ 90... 9.55 :61} _og;,,—o;¢ ,4 9,60 Fawn I, '‘*= p» H: *-‘r-:94 *7‘ H 5 ’'«‘¢.,... ,3 I-8 o m »-—«w... _o‘ 5, ...l3]»d_N . 8:: an, o s “es :6 9 an as 5: .,‘§§.g- 2.5 gas?-"s‘§.%.:-=3 w8"£<°g: we 3.»? 3-5» »°-*- -...-;_=, s~l?‘*:*=s=*sr=‘ “ -ares 0 o’ < "*3; == 13 as E §s;=2.3s«e-"°..9-’- @3812‘ 3~3‘> 0°‘ ° °f12 0 <+N:;;$9°I:r‘”- “ES as: am‘? :-';-:3‘‘‘’‘ 5' 5 Fe 5 m -Efg.°:;,':'r.‘°.°3. .45 was new -4 2; - °* -4 O uvwfie . "3 3.‘: )—<(-5)-la V can AK 2 .1 p‘°h1p.D‘.’3’=" we aim gas s 5*: Lie 2; o ;~,'.§?gg3gs- an ..“7E§;8- $5, ‘<30? :3 8' +6 ’vs»-5 o9‘ p A D‘ 02' :1 m. a>--9=r/=—“‘9’ g3@’gg§c-g-E’-353$ Q5” 8% ' 23 Fo'3E..‘I'5§’c6";7-" 0:22 "“ H.055 "’- BE"-1381 3| ,__, :9: H: o Sig Inna G. ,. ,_.. (Alice 5 Ha r-gO°‘_q: . ...,l§‘®Q“ 5 r~...g 0 cv~¢D‘oF3c-fl, “Q .-<‘%==oU‘b4”° This +4 "3 s'°$5’~s°§»*°~- _°Q°§§>I€“"§ :;t§m S ..g e‘§,g§5.E‘ff -- geese: are s g ssggsss "e e-*‘s='°'9,, 285" W» p. -'-3‘-"--is-§=:. Ts B2,’-95,. OBS. 3 ts §.=~E8u>...:: : g‘g~g§.$€obj:* :..+‘' 5.. cp§,8'J43-at-U9 Efigp n 1:;-5:: Ute faugyg CF Use.-?°“r§o«> -u or” 5: 1 0 o-o»-rr'='° 5 P4 59 ptb 0 “"- <b- . I12 " *"o<!> "" 05' O an id 8? tab‘, <'»>£':<=> ,5 Boo,,,..,B¢-5* -.+ an ¢ :3... ».-\_m T :..«.gg9{£_g:!mEgoe+-U, .—aS1.é_cbD>O b"9°"d¢c- '-9’ . :3 9.4 o *" sou; -- °::‘>-:p*l-73 :5 w 3 5s» s as ssésesaiasiasssss st-3».-==:.-?.. ,''‘= «L» :4; $1.12: as 82» ¢5'm:w'*s:_.g-uo-<°u-gatgld O.»--,,ga.,,g £"s-‘gs-ass 32:5 5-°¢3.ggl-Z5§°,§$g;o""o -sea, «-5»-g=..;sa 3- .0“? “’<<. ""m.8":er'$‘a.”’<71"’ '9"m ’* x:s‘*z°° assets“? 555 53:‘-5”‘ ‘sass 7:“-‘ g§s=§’°‘“”'§ §' 3' m .1979 3° l5W“° 33 9'3-1-““4e\§-CD ®- . p o 15:0 pm -:3 0‘ 5-5-9. B, 5 3" ., ’''° s-E3 an-3' u. 2 -4;: s=z4°‘.,e> ac .. U‘ Q Eegzr 9. say... 0 gifiog g,’ ,3. ;-:.ms» 0?: 5-59 us ca 0 .-- 0» *5 9’=*.—..- 3 o fig-W Q 9' "‘ 33‘ 55 53¢ 0-: afdgg ‘:5 *4 g D‘ $4 and '<: 35 '<3'§_&‘H°:B - o . ... 0 an -ma. "’= <‘° :3 F 3’°°° --i"'sv 3’ ,-,2" s. -2. £3 gs-'.";°-ass -i 4: :2 G’ ‘g; ...3uuP‘° HI qt: ‘T ,3 '.4oo'<:*'14g 2 §- ..s.,s-».» : G =r~---5 € :1. fie: ,, on-. I I4 »\ ° 5' q3'I=‘ 0 mass 3:‘g'§,o mp; "< *’ ' 0 o"° In "-"o I N‘ ...-009,, ca,‘ _ : tn 9“ la- 5 3 §§E= es '9‘ , W \ ,NOI.I.ISOc'[XE[ lIV'IflrIOcl CINV DIJILNHIOS V . ‘3 , @ T S A H d T E E X E S ‘sentences at swsisoaa Winsnv-is Patients will find this a central location, easy of ac- , ‘ cess by horse-cars, either on Tremont or Washington, This widely known Spiritual Clairvoyant examines * ‘sacs K 4-«xx . I , Jan. 31, 1874.- The Books and Speeches of Victoria 0. VVoodhull and Tennie C. Claflin will hereafter be furnished, postage paid, at the following liberal prices: \ The Principles of Government, by Victoria 0. (Wood- hull . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 _ Constitutional Equality, by Tennis 0. Clafiin . . . . . . . . 2 ‘O0 The Principles of Social Freedom . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 25 ' Reformation or Revolution, Whi_ch $9.. . . ._ . . . . . . . . . . . The Elixir of Life; or, Why do we Die ?. . . . . . . 25 The Scare—Orows of Sexual Slavery . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . 25 Three of any of the Speeches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 50 INDUSTRIAL JUSTICE. 1. Go to, now, ye rich men; weep and howl, for your miseries that shall come upon you. 4. Behold the hire of the laborers who have reaped down your fields, which is kept back by fraud, crieth, and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord. Gen. Ep. James, v. 1. VIEWS OF AN OLD REFORMER. BERLIN, N. J ., January 1, 1874. I Vz'etoM'a.-I have spent a large portion of my life, and the , best part of it, in lecturing and writing on various reforms, ' commencing half a century ago, when to utter a word against priestcraft or churchcraft was considered blasphemy and sacrilege; but, amidst threats of imprisonments, mobs and assassination, I kept on, single-handed and alone, deal- ing as plainly with the clergy and churches and all popular errors and abuses as do the most radical of reformers in the present day. For the last six years I have done but little in a public way; have seldom had time to write a page, or the means. to spare for postage. , I wish now to say a few things to the public, and shall offer them to your paper. I have read your paper several months, and heartily agree with you in all you have said about the corruption of the State and National Governments, and rascality and unfit- ness of most of that class of men who make and pretend to execute the laws. I also agree with you in what you say about the slavery and abuse of women by their husbands, and the corruptions in social life, but whether you point to the proper remedy, is a question I am not able to decide, but shall not quarrel with you until I am able to point out a bet- ter way. Emma Hardinge, in her criticisms of you some time ago, agreed with you in your views regarding the rottenness and corruption that everywhere exists, admired your courage, boldness and independence in proclaiming the truth, but dis- agreed with you in toto as to the remedy you recommend for the social evils, but she never hinted at anything better; and this has been the case with nearly all your opponents. None pretend to deny the truth of what yousay about the preva- lent corruptions, but turn to and curse you with all their powers, without attempting to tell you of a better way. Why can they not be calm and‘ candid, and reason with you till the true remedy is found, and then all unite like a band of brothers and sisters and apply it? VVhy do they denounce you,’ call you everything vile and low, pour out their spite in lies and imprisonments, and still not tell you of some better way to accomplish what you are aiming at? I wish now to urge on you the necessity of saying more in favor of the landless workers of our nation. Nature has spread out the earth for the use of all her children, and all have as good a right to land from which to draw their sub- sistence as they have to sun, light, air or water, and no State or nation _ can be really prosperous and happy until all within its borders possess homes of their own. Yet our government, while it declares that all have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, grasps all the soil from which alone life can be supported, then turns every young . man into the street at twenty-one years of age, takes his head and makesit a penal ofiense for him to gather up a bundle of sticks for a fire to preserve life. This is just where the government places its subjects, and if they have not fathers to aid them, and can find no one that can make a profit out of their strength ‘by hiring them, they must beg, steal or starve. Our government has given millions of acres of land to see- tarian schools and colleges- that send out clerical and other human leeches and vampires to feast and fatten on the life- blood (Sf landless workers; and millions of acres more to railroads, besides selling large tracts to speculators at low "rates, giving those drones the power to live on the products of the workers. There are thousands and thousands now out of employment in all our manufacturing districts,'and in a state bordering on starvation, who, /had land always been free, would have become independent cultivators beyond the reach of want. - What we want is for government to stop giving land to cor- ! porations of all kinds, and to reserve it as the birthright in- heritance of the people, giving to every landless person, male or female, as much as they need for cultivation, and no more, and enact a law that no man shall here-after acquire or come in any way into the legal possession of more land than he can cultivate. If we had such a law, the largetracts now owned w AwooDH‘ULL ha} éLArlLiN’s WEEKLY. by individuals would eventually be squandered by spend- thrift" heirs, and divided up into small lots, and the landless would stand a better chance to acquire homes. Some years ago, when the great famine in Ireland swept off so many thousands by starvation, there had been food enough raised in Ireland tk at very year for the support of all, but the best of everything had to go to England to pay the rich landowners for the use of land. Nothing was left for the Irish but potatoes, and that crop being cut off by the rot, the people starved in thousands. Had theyowned the land . they cultivated,,that famine neverwould have been heard of. The management of the land in this country is leading di- rectly to the same results, and woe to the children of all who do not unite in a demand for justice, for’ it is but justice for all: government to see that all their subjects have a chance to secure homes. * Yours, J. HACKER. I TO. THE PI0NEER:S*-GLREETING'. 7 BEDFORD ROAD, CLAPHAM RISE, LONDON, S. ‘W., ENGLAND, January 1, 1874. I turn with disgust from the records of carnage by Greek- fire and stink-pot heroes; of mercenary soldiers in gaudy livery slaughtering the villagers of Africa; of the hireling troops of trained murderers sent to clear the way for English , "trading and cheateries. And I turn to you, brothers and sis- ters——pioneers of peace and good—will. I turn with loathing from the daily reports of the vile and cruel intrigues of courts ; from the corruption of St. Stephens, Versailles, Madrid, Berlin, Washington——and I greet you, brothers and sisters‘, messengers of the people. _ Inasmuch as you are good, you are God, and your voice is the voice of God. ’ You.war against slavery, against the Jewish impositions and usurpations; against the subjection of men and women to the J ew-god, gold. \ Gold-hired women (called wives), parsons, pews, lawyers (called legislators), judges, soldiers. Gold-bought licenses to be married and buried. Gold-bought licenses to dig and plow the land of our birth. Gold-bought licenses to retain our birthrights-—to make use of our heritage. I greet you, /sisters and brothers, as you wage war with the irnpious traders in license. Heroes and martyrs! I greet you lovingly! ‘ ' K Who shall forbid the sun to shine, the winds to blow, the earth to revolve, the infinite universe to fulfill its mission? What parson or lawyer shall make laws or sell licenses for these? Yet they pretend to manufacture laws for the people, and they sell licenses to work and wed! Damn the sordid mongers, the soulless usurers who would sell freedom by the inch, our birthrights and heritage for gold! The infamous devils trample love under foot as they rush too and fro in their idiotic strife for gold. A As if gold could be an equivalent for a,?.moment’s love! ‘As if gold could purchase our inalienable heritage and birthright from us! _ As if gold could purchase a righteous title to exclusive ownership of the earth! As if men could make laws! As if gold could bribe God! As if gold were greater than the earth—greater than God or the people! V ' Sisters and brothers, Igreet you as you war against sub- jection to mammon. 1 esteem you more than all the liveried kings, generals, admirals, bishops, lawyers and legislators. I esteem you even morethan I do the signers of your old Declaration of Independence or your stars and stripes. I esteem you as I esteem Christ the hero and martyr——the Communist. ' Sisters and brothers! Each man and woman has special powers and failings, and both should be respected. Our rights are equal, but our duties are as different as our powers. \Ve must be respecters of persons. g I ’ Heroes and martyrs! I-Ieralders of the Commune o ,.- neace on earth and good will among mankind, I greet youlovingly, frankly, boldly, hopefully, fraternally. . WILLIAM HARRISON RILEY. ___.__ KEEP THE BALL ROLLING. Editors Weekly—I am glad to see that the subject of com- munal life is still being considered, and hope" it may be agi- tated through your columns till enough earnest souls are drawn together to make practical’the grand ideal which I am happy to know came not to me alone, as was soon proved ' by the numerous correspondence I received from warm- hearted sympathising friends, made such by afinity of ideas. lndeed, so numerous was the correspondence, that in my then weak state of health I could not answer a tithe of it; but I shall ever feel grateful for their kind words of cheer and sympathy in an hour so much needed, when I feared 1 stood alone, and there were none who would appreciate what to me seemed so beautiful. ~ ‘ V That itis the true order of social life I am satisfied. and when the world has once entered upon it, they will wonder how they ever lived. in‘ the present narrow confines of sel- fishness. * I ADELAIDE COMSTOCK. I ,---—-—————->—+9>—< SOCIALISTIC. A MINISTERIAL BRUTE. “ Theworst case of brutality upon the part of a father that we have been called upon to chronicle is that of an old man, a minister of the gospel, and who lives near the line- of the counties of Muhlenburg an.d McLean, his residence being in the former county. This old man, who has heretofore borne a good character among his brethren, been long- winded in the pulpitand vociferous in. prayer, is the father ’ of a handsome daughter, to whom a young gentleman in the neighborhood a few weeks since made proposals of marriage. (We suppress his name because of his entire ignorance of the nature of the case). This young man is of a good family and the owner of some property, but from some cause of which she had the sole right to be judge, he was utterly repugnant to her fancy, or her idea of a ‘husband. The old man, how- ever, was anxiousthat she should receive his proposals‘, and from her own statements, after repeated persuasions to this effect, all of whichishe answered in the negative, he gathered a horse-whip and forced her to take her dress from her fair young shoulders, which he then lacerated with. cruel blows from the. whip until she promised to accept this man as her companion for life, which she accordingly did that evening, knowing that the old villain had taken a seat near the door to hear that she made good her promise. As the preparations for the wedding progressed, twice did this daughter implore mercy of her inhuman father, but just so often did she have neighborhood, informing him of her troubles. He, with sev- 3 eral others, went that “night to her rescue, and carried her » to Greenville, where she threw herself upon the mercies of the court. A gentleman in high standing promptly executed ‘bond and was appointed her guardian.” The above, which I clip from a Western paper, is only one of many instances which might be cited as showing / that the minister of the period is much like other men. The public at large have no adequate idea of the number of min- isterial delinquencies constantly occurring. ‘ Having had ac- cess daily to a large number of papers from all parts of ‘the countr ‘, I, myself, have been somewhat astonished to find so_much “depravity” among “the cloth.” The truth is, all his prayers and pious words. Vlfih him, as with the rest of the world, it is a question ofrbread and butter, as evi- denced by the avidity with which they will respond to the The delinquencies comprise‘ moral obliquities of all kinds, not the least being such as border on lust, if not its direct in- spiration. This phase of vice is nothing new, but has been inhonstant practice! all along. Cases of lust are constantly cropping out, and, what is singular, the fellows don’t lose caste; Why, a few years ago, a Methodist minister in this city became much too intimate with a number of the females of his congregation. There was a little breeze, but no essen- tial ‘measureswere taken to silence him. He was permitted to slide away, and finally was made consul to a British port, where he is now. the Church bawls “Free Love!” when an attempt is made to put things on their proper basis. Verily, the days when men “ strain at gnats and swallow camels” are not passed. \ VVILLIAM Fosrnn, JR‘. PROVIDENCE, January 10, 1874. HYMN FOR THE NEW YEAR. BY JAMES LAIDLAW. Spirit of Universal Love, _ That cloth in all things work and move, V For this New Year we live to see, _‘We render thanks and praise to thee. Oh, Love! Thou new, blest name for Go K The hu.man‘heart’s thy best abode. Sacred, purifying flame, VVe worship thy most holy name. With gratitude our hearts inspire, Immortal source of sweet desire. Oh’, Love! Thou newblest name for God, The human heart’s thy best abode. Parent of beauty! Gracious Dove! Celestial, pure and perfect Love! Thou art the way, the truth, the life; Thy power alone can conquer strife. Oh, Love! Thounew, blest name for God. The human heart’s thy best abode. Soul-sustaining tenderness,’ Let thy peaceful, calm impress Like the evening dews descend, And with our human spirits blend. Oh, Love! Thou new, blest name for God, he human heartfs thy best abode. Source of wisdom, source of good, I Let thy blest beatitude Bring peace and joy and harmony, And to our thoughts give sweet employ. Oh, Love! Thou new, blest name for God, The human hearts thy best abode. ‘Ambition, envy, sweep away, Keep us beneath thy constant sway; That we thy mighty power may prove To conquer selfishness by love. Thou holiest, purest name for God, The human heart’s thy best abode. Oh, Love! Thy kingdom is the soul, Thy crown is prudent self-control. Wisdom, it is thy beacon light, Thy fount of pleasure and delight. , Oh, Love! Thou new, blest name for God, The human heart’s thy best abode. Spirit divine! Thou’rt everywhere, As universal as the air; . In buds that burst, in winds thatblow, In rippling waterls tinkling flow; But the true heart’s thy best abode, Thou noblest, new, blest name for God. I The steady and untiriiig beat _ or thy great heart all things repeat; I We see thy flowing waves extend Through ranks of being without end. The crawlingworm beneath the sod, Oh, Love! Thy beauty blends with eta’. Thine endless, golden, winding stair Is grand, and glorious, and fair; the wounds upon her fair shoulders again laid open with the ‘ lash. The evening before the one appointed for the wed- ding, she contrived to convey a note to a gentleman in the the minister is no better than the average of pe_ople, with" “ call of the Lord ” when there is’ a bigger salary in the case. A . Thus it goes. The “saints” plow with the heife‘rs:l”m§".Kd . 1 Jan. 31, 1874.’ A rising and descending light ‘VVhose scale is vast and infinite; But the true heart’s thy best abode, , Thou highest, noblest 1.211.110 for God! ‘ Angel ofLifc! smn we deny Thy heavenly auihr:-nticity, Because, forsooth, in dens of shame, Men oft blaspheme thy precious ‘name. No, Level ’l‘heir hearzfis thy blest abode—.- Should be—thou purest name for God! Oh, Love! Thou art the vestibule Unto the temple of the soul; That glorious temple, fair and free, ‘ Where all are worshipers of thee. Oh, Love! Thou art the heavenly road That leads to that divine abode. Happy are they, and only they , Who walk thy glorious, broad high-way; For those who journey from thy light Journey "toward eternal night. Oh, Love! Thou new, blest name for God, The human heart’s thy best abode. Thou radiant daughter of the skies, Child of immortal harmonies, Oh, let tl1y ‘will on earth be done, Thy glowing chariot wheels run on I Baptize our souls beneath thy flood, Thou burning breath and soul of Godi Thy government shall ne’cr decay, , . Thy kingdom never pass away, i ‘ While tinieis eternal tide shall roll; ’ Thy power shall subjugateithc soul. Oh, Love! Thou new, blest name for God, 1 Our Earth shall yet be thine abode. Then, Love, thy temple grand shall be Built on the mount of Liberty; ~ And then shall Earth lift up her voice * To heaven, and say, Rejoice! Rejoice! For then shall Love be understood, Tobe the highest human good. MARRIAGE. Mrs. I/Voodhull—I suppose if I was in the habit of doing as others do, I should commence with “Dear Siste_r;” but to me the term seems superfluous and even invidious, as I have learned that a person or a-society willcall you “sister” or “ brother ” so long as you do not disagree with them, or are willing to sip out of their little cup of truth; but the moment you attempt to drink at the fountain the endearing term is immediately withheld. Again, if there never was a person. that under the circumstances could have acted any differ- ently. from what they did, then are not all equally entitled to the endearing appellation? In the WEEKLY of December 27, under the heading “What is the Theory of Modern Marriage?” it reads: “\Ve have never yet been able to drive any of the defenders of the in- stitution of modern marriage down to the propositions upon which they pretend that it rests, and which removed, society would be plunged into anarchy and confusion; or to define the special purposes for which they so imperatively demand its continuance,” etc. Again :‘ “ So, then, to come to the real question at issue, we will inquire, For what do people marry?” And then, “There is no use of attempting to an- swer this in any general and superficial manner,” etc. Driven to the wall they (women) will be compelled to admit that they marry to have sexual relations and to bear children, and for this only.” Now, from the manner in which this question is put, it may be answered in different ways. If it had read, “ For what should people marry!” it would to me have appeared more definite; and from the wording of the answer given I infer thiswas the sense intended. One of your correspondents writes, _f‘ Marriage is mar- riage.” Good! When a man says, “My wife,” when a wo- mon says, .“,My husband,” does it not imply mutual posses- sion?’ Now how do they come to own this title? Is it not by the most natural process in the world! Surely it is more blessed to give than to "receive. Well, when a woman offers herself toa man—perhaps not by words but by actions which speak louder than words——-offers herself, all that she has, all V that she is~.—-in a word, to be his wife, the man accepts this woman which he loves onijust’ one condition, that of the most exquisite selfishness, that she should accept him for her hus- band. By what authorityis this title conferred? Is it not by virtue of that God-given faculty which causes each to leave ‘father and mother and all the sacred associations of childhood and home, and cleave ‘each to the other in the Willing bonds of conjugal love and affection? That faculty whose language has been beautifully expressed by a poet in “ these lines: “ Oh, had we some bright Little isle of our own, In a blue summer’s ocean Far off and alone; I/Vhere the leaf never dies / In the still, blooming bowers, And the bee banquets on ‘ Through a whole year of flowers. Where the sun loves to pause, With so fond a delay, That the night only seems To draw vail o’er the day. . Where to feel that we are, ‘ And to know that we are, ‘ Is worth the best joy That life elsewhere can give. Where with souls ever ardent, And pure as the elime, ‘ We’d love as they loved, In that first golden time," Whdb 330d IVES ilhllfi joined i302,'8i3h.e§ ghould any may} 31: ' Site is its? _ i?:!.l;x;«‘r)if%l*s who 1 the press, for thousands upon thousands to read. be doing their whole duty when they entirely ignore and eschew any of the divinely-appointed faculties of the race, and especially one that is of so much consequence to mankind as this faculty of “union for life,” love of one; this faculty without which there would never have been a conjugal union on earth? Has the great Creator made a. mistake? Let a boy or girl havethis faculty large and amativeness comparatively small, and they will not willingly allow one of the opposite sex ever to give them a kiss. Ignorance says, “ That boy never’ll get married; he's too afraid of the girls. That girl never’ll get married; she’s too shy of the boys,”\ not once imagining that it is this very law of m.arr'i-age that prevents their famili- arity, nor yet that these are the very ones most likely to get married. , _ 1 . Is not the decadence of this faculty in the people greatly to be deplored? Let us for one moment consider the change if all men and all women could have this faculty cultivated, predominant“. Not one man but would desire and seek la. wife ;‘ not one woman but would desire and seek a husband; and each having found, not one woman desiring any other man, not one man desiring any other woman. No Fisks shot; no Stokeses tried for murder. All other things being equal, is not such a consummation to be devoutly wished? I I have written of none of the general causes‘ for which people do marry. but have confined myself to this single faculty, because this law of marriage recognizes no general or superficial causes. It is entirely blind to them. I It carries its possessor gladly from the luxuries of the mansion to the toil-and privations of the cabin; from the ease and safety of land to the perils and dangers of accompanying those who go down to the sea in ships and do business on the mighty deep, and through the trackless forests with the adventurous explorer. Now, does-the marriage law of the land, founded on this faculty, have anything to do with side issues? Dees it question the parties about having children or not having children? VVhat is this really but a publishment to the world, perhaps through the aid of alpriest, perhaps not, that each in the other has found their eeiijugal mate? If they have de- ceived each other, where is the fault? The lawbelieves them true until they prove themselves false. I would like to refer all persons interested in this subject to the history of two individuals contained in the Old Testa- ment. First, that of» Joseph as servant in Potiphar’s house (Genesis, chap. 39) and his marriage with Asenath. Second, that of Ammon, the kings son (II. Sam., 13). Let any woman ask herself which of these two characters she would choose for a. companion, and why she would choose one rather than the other; why she would choose one whose intensest love would not endure trial an hour, or why she would choose one whose love would last a lifetime—yea, more? Has human nature changed? Did Napoleon transfer his affection for Josephine when by proxy he ma.rrt'ed the Austrian princess? Did Josephine change hers when she signed that instrument of separation? VVhen the storms of adversity lowered over the pathway of the ambitious husband, which would fly to the rescue? Does any one imagine that this affection that, unabated, endures the storms of life will not survive the calmsof death? L. R. E. V A NEW? CATECHISM. No. 1. What is aggravating? A human cat and dog tied to each Other. What is misery, slavery, degradation and humiliation? Intellect chained. to stupidity. , What istlze culmination of degradation, misery and suffer- ing? Married life. _ H What isa devil? The god who joined them together. VVhat is hell? A discordant family. I What are imps? Vice generated into human beings. What is crime‘? Effects of incarnated propensity. What is regeneration? An affort to straighten a crooked tree. , A What are evil causes? Ill-assorted marriages. What are sad effects? Vice generated into flesh, blood and bone. , What are ultimates? Prisons and the gallows. “That are Sunday-school teachers? N urserymen. VVhat are preachers? Orchardists,istriving to graft a fig into a wild thorn, honey locust or slippery elm. When is satan going about seeking whom he may devour? When he is hungering for more palatable food than he usu- ally gets. - ' Why is satan pictured with hoofsand horns? Because he requires to be armed both offensive and defensive, to meet the company he finds. \D. JENKINS. SOCIAL EVILS. EAs'r‘DoRsnr, Jan. 12, 1874. Wbodhull and 0.la.flt'u’s WeeIcly—In looking over my old diaries to-day I found in one dated 1867, the following article entitled Social evils. You may do with it as you see fit; may God and the angels guide you in your glorious work. Atrue friend. A V i A. L. VVA11‘. “ In the Banner of L2'ght for Dec. 14, 1867, is an article under the head of Social Evils. It is a good article, and I wish that evey lover of humanity could read it. I wish especia.lly_that every orthodox minister could read it. Possibly some of them could be led to see that Sabbath breaking, unbelief, dancing, non-attendance upon Church services, prayer-meet- ings, etc., are not the great crying sins of this generation. “The people are tired of hearing sermons upon these threadbare, worn-out and falsely presented subjects. Why not, Christian ministers, treat your congregations for once to a discourse upon these real and actual sins? Why not talk to "those of them who are husbands and fathers, after this wise: ‘Brethren, everybody in this world has their faults. There is a good deal of evil and a good deal of good in everybody’s heart. But every one has a peculiarly beset- ting sin; a sin by which they are easily -tempted and led away. Now I believe, brethren, that the peculiar bcsetting Oi: we of its .t*%8?%ss=d% mi time at n WOODHULL &cLArLIi~xés WEEKLY. congregation, is, too frequent indulgence of the sexual pro- pensity in lawful wedlock. I do not charge many of you with infidelity to your wives, but I do say that many of you are shortening the days of your eompanions—whom you have vowed before heaven and earth to love, cherish and protect——by too great an indulgence of this propensity. I dis- like to say anything that may appear harsh or unkind, or that is calculated to wound the feelings, but Ilam commanded to speak the whole truth, whether men will bear or forbear. I believe that there are thousands and tens of thousands of men who are killing their wives in the wayI have mentioned, ‘ just as surely and truly, and many of them as criminally, as if one should open a. vein upon his wife’s arm and extract daily therefrom a certain quantity of blood. All men who are conscious—and there are many such—that they. are thus killing their wives by inches, are just as guilty before God as if they took their lives by some other direct process.’ “It will probably be a long time before ministers will be brave enough, and free enough to their convictions, to speak such plain, homely, truthful, terrible Words as these. But the time will come when some onewill dare to talk thus. “ No great wrong was ever righted without plainly spoken words directed right at the root of the evil. No great revolu- tion was ever performed silently, and in the dark. “ Abuse of the sexual propensity——a propensity just as pure and holy, and as proper to be understood and talked about as any other propensity God has given us~—in various ways is the giant sin of our day, and leads directly and indirectly toimore misery and unhappiness that any other evil that can be named. ' “A good deal has been written of late upon the sin of abor- tion, and women are most sorely condemned for this truly terrible and unnatural manner for the prevention of off- spring. Buthow many abortions, think you, would be com- mitted, if husbands and those who are not husbands never had sexual intercourse without ‘consulting and honestly abiding by the wishes of the opposite sex? Here lies the worst of the matter. God has given woman a nature loving, confiding, dependent, tolerant of abuse——and men, thousands and millions of them, are low enough in the scale of being to take advantage of these God-given and beautiful charac- teristics of woman, and entail upon her the cares, pains, trials and responsibilities of maternity, without consulting her wishes, any more than if she had not the slightest inter- est in the matter. Well and truly has Henry Ward Beecher said, ‘ There is a. great deal of the animal about man yet.’ “ Now-I do not believe that women are angels. But as far as regards the matter under consideration, I believe she is ~ a. great deal purer and better than our own sex. _ Foeticism is a, crime. I have no apologies for it. But man is most to blame. What is the cure? VVhat is the remedy for this degradation, this defilement, this leprosy of uncleanliness, with which our race is afflicted! In a few words it is this: All men, all women who are working for the good of human- ity, must learn this important lesson, and then teach it and preach it, viz. : The true road to the restoration of the soul to God is through the restoration of the body to purity. Let every man and woman and child seek to so live thattheir bodies may become a fit temple for the indwelling of the Holy Ghost, and the great work is accomplished.” ' » ' “PHYSICIAN.” MOSES, ETC. FARMINGTON, Mich., Jan. 11, 1874. When Moses “ spoke his piece,” Mrs. Grundy acknowl- edged herself “inadequate to _ the occasion.” However, people quite generally signified their disapprobation; some in proper and temperate terms, and some in terms like the following: “When a man’s brains get so large as to endanger society, it is a pity that some one could not be found to‘blow them out.” “ That beastly monster, Moses Hull.” “She is just as bad as he; hanging would be too good‘ for her.” If all of Hull?s critics were as fulliof the murder spirit as some are, hewould not have to “ want to be a martyr” long. Some men have five or six dead wives. It is a wonder that Moses Hull had not been one of these men. Neither they nor their wives are “beastly monsters,” but they are victims of ignorance and of rules and regulations more arbitrary and cruel than any that obtain among beasts. [Some chance readers of the VYEEKLY may need this explanation: I do not believe that beasts have better rules and regulations than it is possible for human beings to adopt.] When we are about to conclude that Moses Hull is totally depraved, let us re- member that his wife still lives, notwithstanding some overly- good people think the earth is defilcd by her presence. Soon after Moses said his say, the Battle Creek correspon- dent of the Detroit Tribune said in substance that when Moses quit the Adventists to join. the Spiritualists the for- mer were exceedingly wroth, and now that he had revealed his true character, , Wthe Spiritualists would be wrathy, too.‘ The correspondent ‘ventured this prediction: “Mrs. Hull, being a sensitive and sensible woman, will doubtless repu- diate Moses and his free-love nonsense.” Failing to “repu- diate,” she must now be set down as the exact opposite of sensitive and sensible——a transition moresudden and sur- prising than any mentioned by Darwin. Men alone make the laws by which a wean is hanged; but when ‘~‘ hanging is too good for her,” women pronounce and execute the severer penalty, the social anathema. Every now and then some drunkenwretch murders some woman because she will not remain his slave for life. A man jury merely acquits him, but woman crowns him a hero. Man’s inhumanity to man‘ is tender mercy compared to woman’s inhumanity to woman. Mrs. Grundy is forever asserting that every woman who does not toe her chalk mark is a pros- titute; and the vworld has decreed that prostitutes have no rights that the immaculate are bound to respect. ‘ For cruelty, the treatment of prostitutes by respectables A reminds me of the plan the Chinese are said to have of throw- ing living infants into charnel vaults. And. agasiflg ii? -”£'6}11i111d7S, me the old—fashioned hell. ’ A “ Bar in the deep where d3;!‘1§fl9Ss,(lWGll§'<e iiilm laid in iw,en~or Sfiirl, pier, 3. ‘yr -...!l ’. ,__ L};-v*--~ Jan. 31,1874. Justice has built a dreadful hell, And laid the stores of vengeance there. “ Eternal plagues and heavy chains, Tormenting racks and fiery coals, And darts to inflict immortal pains Dyed in the blood of damned souls.” The good but ensnared and abandoned girl is placed in the same category with ‘the “ aged sinner ’.’¢- “ Behold the aged sinner goes, Laden with guilt and heavy woes, Down to the regions of the dead, ” With endless curses on his head. “ Tempests of angry fire shall roll To blast the rebel worm, And beat upon the naked soul In one eternal storm.” . And that is just what Mrs. Grundy is doing to prostitutes and to every woman that she impales upon her spit. If ever I am uncharitable, may it be in denunciation of the uncharitable, but—— . \ V “ Let not this weak, unknowing hand Presume Thy bolts to throw, Nor deal damnation round the land U” each I=judge Thy foe.” GEORGE ROBERTS. MATRIMONIAL WRECKS. BY WARREN CHASE. Every street in our large cities and every highway in the country is lined with the strewn fragments of matrimonial wrecks, and yet we are warned to keep our unholy tongues silent and our pens still on the causes of these broken frag- ments, while priest and lawyer, hypocrite and libertine con- iinue to increase the supply of heart-broken, head-broken and health-broken remnants of inharmonial sexual relations. The first object that attracts our.« attention is the swarms of physically, morally and spiritually diseased and deformed children, mostly undesired and unwelcome, that are forced into life, and many luckily into death,‘ through the gate of marriage; and we must not even propose to lessen these by giving the woman power to refuse to bear them, except at the risk of being branded by every lustful tyrant’ with .:the most obnoxious terms his vulgar vocabulary can furnish. The people are called upon to defend the holy institution that practices them, and assured by the wise, blind guides that soon as the legal slavery is abolished the swarm of un- welcome children will be increased, and they, the honest men, will be taxed to support them, utterly ignoring the fact that woman will no longer be a slave but be by law or society protected against such lustful tyrants as new force her into maternity, recklessly and against her choice and health. Well do we know that the present system of mar- riage laws give three times the license for children out of wedlock that social freedom would, yet four-fifths of these miserable specimens are born in the legalized institution, and most of them are christened by a Christian church that cannot save them from the hell they inherited. The next class of fragments that attracts our attention is the numerous tombstones that record the early deaths of young wives and mothers, who often follow each other to the num- ber of three or four from the same husband’s fatal embrace, and if we seek the cause we usually find a man of coarse, sensual, but vigorous physical structure, who almost in- variably sought the very opposite (to be sure that he had got a pure wife), and thus sent the delicate flowers of affection to the graveyard to make room for another, often looked out before the black bandage is taken ofi the hat. No voice of warning is sufiicient to keep these delicate forms out of such arms of deathly gripe, so long as marriage is the only market for which girls are raised, and the only destiny they can look to for a home or a decent funeral, and the only place where the natural, maternal yearning of the female heart can be satisfied without disgrace, abuse and abandonment. A sad picture this from the graveyard, reader. , “Muse and ponder on this half-eifaced, inscription." The next group that attracts our attention is the multitude of separated and still living parties, whose testimony goes to show that God did not put together those the priests marry inxhis name and order to live together till death sepa- rates them and their poor souls be set free once more to volunteer in future unions. or reject them at will with no more tyrant law to bind “the gentle to the ‘savage mind where love abhors the sight.” Let the separated speak of. ,matrimony. There are witnesses enough now of that class: some having tried it several times can give double testimony._ Read the legal trials for separation and the contests for the children, and then tell us why the parties, who are alone the interested, should not have the legal power to separate in- stead of carrying it to courts and feeing lawyers and judges. The next sad picture that meets our gaze is the living and standing monuments of matrimonial infelicity and discord —~-teaiudropping, heart-broken, health-broken, vow-broken, sorrow-stricken wives of fretful and tyrannical husbands, bearing unwelcome children biennially, half of which drop into the grave in childhood, and half of the other half not fit to raise~—curses to themselves and to society——fire—scathed with paternal heritage of tobacc0,’s nerve-curse that poisoned both mother and child; washing, cooking,’ scrubbing, or, Worse still. gossiping. tatling. prying and scolding along the line of life, while the “lord and master” is prattling with other females or speculating with the “ bulls and bears,” or, better still, plowing and planting with the cattle and hogs. Poor, sad-hearted mortals! love died the next year after marriage and .waits beyond the grave for resurrection. But passion and power lived‘ on in the golden bondage that proved a. galling chain of iron. Not all marriages are such, says a defender of the institution. Well do I know it, and the exceptions are worthy of note, for they are the oases in the matrimonial desert -that would not" be destroyed by social freedom nor by cultivating the whole. social globe with a better product. It is interesting to hear the lordly tyrants 9‘ the 1“-3‘? Washed Portion of this class dilate on the sensual r vvocnncm. a (‘§i.«At‘LIN"S vV"'EEKi.fl_. A " character of the advocates of social freedom and danger of moral destruction by the freedom of woman from sexual bondage and social slavery. These are the wise conservators of virtue and moral purity, backed by a class of hypocrites who live double lives——one for the public and the other in private with their paramours. We know scores of this latter class among Spiritualists, nearly every one of whom is harping and carping in public and private about the abominations of Moses Hull and the horrible doctrines of \VVoodhullism, like the thief with hispockets full of stolen goods running with the crowd crying lustily, “ Stop thief, stop thief.” They are well known to the angels, and their masks will be taken off so that the honest and deceived multitude will know them as they are. They are barking lustily at Moses Hull now, and it reminds us.of the dogs in I-Iudibras—— “ Soon a wonder came to light, ‘ Which showed the rogues they lied. The man recovered from the bite, The dog it was that died.” One more class andlwe leave the picture. The heart- \ _broken, soul yearning, unmarried and unmated. A specimen of these will suffice for the female side of our picture. Many V years ago we made the acquaintance of an ardent and affec- tionate maid of over forty, whose wealth and education, we know, must have brought her many offers of marriage, and we asked the reason she was single, and she told us that an elder sister tried it, and still lived in wealth and luxury, but a heart-broken and sickly mother, often for months unable to leave her room, and as she told her sister the reason and her experience, she warned her with the frightful picture. That kept her out of the snare; and as she spent much time in the house of this sister she was obliged to fight and bolt that husband from her own person. MARRIAGE GONE TO snnn. Mrs. Ann Eliza Young, delivered her nineteenth lecture in Denver, Colorado. She says, that at present, polygamy is principally fed by the foreign element, Swedes and Danes. Many times wives are thrown aside and a new one taken, sim- ply for the work she can perform as dairy—ni'aid, housekeeper orcook. It is cheaper than paying as well as boarding help. Polygamous husbands are widely distributed. Brigham Young has one wife in Provo, fifty miles south of Salt Lake, and another in St.George, three hundred and fifty miles away. Many of the wives of apostles provide for themselves,and some support their husbands; the four wives of a bishop sustain ing that divine by washing and house-cleaning. Husbands dis- criminate in the treatment of their women. Mary Ann An- gel, Brigham’s first wife, lives in retirement and neglect, while Amelia, his favorite has, every luxury and indulgence, and lives ina palace which cost $100,000. Neglected wives, learn to hate their husbands, and their children sympathize with them. A little girl said one day to‘ her mother: “Mamfna, I do wish God had made men enough, so that every little girl could have a father to love her.” Mormons sometimes marry their sisters, a bishop married his brother’s daughter; another wedded six of his neices, and there was an instance where mother, daughter and grandmother were married to one man. Mrs. Young’s picture of polygamy is certainly not an amiable one.~—Day’s Doings. I WHOM no GREAT MEN MARRY? W"omen, of course. But they show the same diversity of taste that is seen in the lower ranks, and on the whole make worse mistakes. They, however, generally show the same sense in choosing wives that they show in managing other people’s affairs, whether it be good or bad. John Howard, the great philanthropist, married his nurse. She was alto- gether beneath him in social life and intellectual capacity, and beside this, was fifty-two years old, while he was but twenty-five, He would not take N o for an answer, and they were married, and lived happily together until her death, which occurred two years afterward. Peter the Great, of Russia, married a peasant girl. She made an excellent wife and a sagacious empress. Humboldt married a poor girl be- cause he loved her. Of course they were happy. Shakespeare loved and Wedded a farmer’s daughter. She was faithful to her vow, but we can hardly say the same of the great bard himself. Like most of the great poets, heshowed too little discrimination in bestowing his affection on the other sex. Byron married Miss Millbank to get her money to pay his debts. It turned out a bad shift. Robert Burns married a farm-girl, with whom he fell in love while they worked to- gether in the plow-field. -He, too, was irregular in his life, and committed the most serious mistakes in conducting his domestic affairs. Milton married the daughter of a country squire, but lived with her only a short time. He was an aus- tere, exacting, literary recluse,while she was arosy, romping country lass, who could not endure the restraints put upon her, and so they separated. Subsequently, however, she re- turned, and they lived tolerabl y happy. Queen Victoria and Prince Albert were cousins, and about the only example in the long line of English monarchs wherein the marital vows were sacredly observed and sincere afiection existed. VVash- ington married a widow with two children. It is enough to say of her that she was -worthy of him, and that they lived as married folks should, in perfect harmony. John Adams married the daughter of a Presbyterian clergyman- Her father objected on account of John being a lawyer; he had a bad opinion of the morals of the profession. General Sher- man married the daughter of Thomas Ewing, of Ohio, whe was a member of General Taylor’s cabinet. This alone would have been a good start in life for any young man.—.Ewchangc. I WISH IT WERE RESPECTABLE. I wish it were respectable for men and women to be true to themselves, and live according to Natur-e’s laws; to think, speak and act for themselves, in spite of books, false education, hollow society, and the arbitrary rules of salaried priests, who are supported by the ill-gotten gains of the rich and the hard earnings of the poor. - I Wish it were respectable for women. to learn the laws of fix their life and «being; to learn that Nature made them right, and that infringement upon her laws b‘rings its sure pen- alty. , I wish itwere respectable for women to town themselves after, as well as before, marriage, and to underst-anidingly realize‘ that man has no right to rob her of that freedom which naturallybelongs to her, and which she, as an indi- vidual, sentient being, ought to demand and claim. I wish Saint Custom and his wife Propriety were both dead and buried, then children could be taught to sing Pro- gression’s notes without fear; they could be taughtin our common schools the laws of Nature and destiny; they could capacities and power of attainments in the future. I wish it were respectable for every man and woman to so understand themselves that they could be a law unto themselves; then, I opine, there would be less hypocrisyiand rascality in high places; less chains forged to perpetuate slavery, social and political. I wish it were respectable for men to behave themselves, and allow woman to speak her honest sentiments, upon a public rostrum, withoutbeing hissed at, and finally grossly insulted and obliged to retire, as in the case of Victoria C. Woodhull, at Ann Arbor, not long since. I wish it were respectable for such men, whose souls are as mean as those who disgraced themselves and the uni- versity to which they belonged, to be marked and ignbred by every justice—loving citizen in the world. . Talk of freedom! ’Tis but a name, and weak at that! I wish. it were respectable for manto respect and honor his brother man, however he‘ may honestly “difier-in opinions and in the manner of expression, and not cause the arrest soul is above such an act, and, in fine, could not blaspheme, ‘because he is a law unto himself. I wish it were respectable to lay aside books, however time-honored and sacred they may be, and reason upon all things; reason upon Nature, the formation of the earth, the philosophy of life, the science of death, the constant and eternal progression of all things. I wish it were respectable to love all days alike, and not compel theilittle ones to attend Sunday school, and cram down their mental throats stories which their common sense rebels at, as impossible, and, if they question its truth, are hushed with, "You must believe, and not question God’s Holy Word.” Out upon such teachings! Away with them! and let the young be taught that they have a right to all truth in heaven or earth; and that no power can limit or bind the mind, as it soars for light, truth and knowledge. It claims that right, and when the world learns that it is respectable to be wise, they will lay aside their masks, and learn from themselves, and stand upon their real true worth as individuals. -», i M. L. D. SHERMAN. Annixn, Mich., January 9, 1874. MAG-DALEN’S PROTECTIVE UNION PROJECT. Dear Weekly-—The wholeindustrial world seems bent. on revolution, protection, equal recognition and justice to each particular branch of labor, interest and traific. Every oc- cupation’ seems to be on a strike. To, promote the interests of each particular vocation, each class resolves itself into a protective association or fraternity, which in many cases unite for more general protection and the promotion of the whole labor fraternity. J - But with all the leagues, industrial associations, protective unions, etc., etc., there are still monopolies and there is still injustice somewhere. The very existence of these protective bodies is a sufficient voucher to the fact that somebody con- siders himself aggrieved. .Whatever is a legitimate occupation is and will be looked upon as worthy of protection. Hence the honest world must look with admiration and approval upon any system which has the intent to alleviate the wrongs, dissipate the disad- vantages and exalt the method by which the producer and furnisher of every supply may be best able to meet the de- mands of the consumer and purchaser, without stultif/ying cupation would of necessity encompass him. In the protection of individual rights, which may base their legitimacy either "upon the acknowledgment by law and license, or by custom and popular demand, so popular as to have become universal almost, neither the law governing nor the prejudices opposing have any right to discriminate between the advantages to be gained by the purchaser and the abuses’ that may obtain through excess of the purchase. So long as license is granted to the liquor dealer, so long will it be a legitimate business to deal out poison to the pur- chaser, and so long will it be the duty of the government that accepts its revenue taxes as its recognition of the legiti- vendee. . Therefore we have not at this time the desire to slay either the one or the other, since it must be a fact too eminently recognized, that whether it be a wrong to purchase or a wrong to sell, there isdemand, and that is the regulation of the sale. To stop the evil is to prohibit not the purchase nor the sale, but the deInand—:—the appetite. The same may be said in regard to the regulation of the Social evil as is argued in relation to the liquor traffic, and both should base their “regulations” (if evils can ever be- come regulated so as to become tolerated vices or negative virtues) upon the suppression or decrease of the demand, and it is in behalf of the Magdalen class whose rights have been violated and whose individual interest has been out- raged, not alone by popular prejudices but by the divine (?)‘ ordinances of the law and the patrons of their profession, the law-makers, the officials of the law’s enforcement, that I would plead. ‘ ‘ ~ ’ / , There is no one profession, business or occupation in the world so largely patronized and sustained by public dignita- ries-—from priestly pulpit, presidential and judicial benches, to petty constabulary ofiicials and police purloiners--that is \ be taught the infinite depths of their own spiritswof their A‘ of an honest infidel upon the charge of blasphemy, whose ' or debasing the individual beyond the limit or drift, his oc-, macy of the trafiic, to protect the vender as ‘well as the . 6 j _ I gwoonnuttsga. ULAFLIISWS WEEKLY. Jan. 31, 1874. A as wantonly encroached upon by trespass and unjust laws as that of the professional Magdalen.‘ A I ~ Men confess their sex so wanton as tomake the existence of the brothel a 1”‘ necessity,” inorder to better insure pro- tection and safety to the “respectable ” wives, sisters and daughters of the men requiring the “ necessity.” Men who are willing to make such a graceful acknowledg- ment in compliment to themselves, should be as willing to pay tribute of respect to the institutions that save their own families from sexual pillage, and be as ready to protect Mag- dalens from the outrages of unjust laws, as they are to screen a brother from the exposure of his “little irregularities.” Since they will not do this, the prostitute women must do what they can to protect themselves. , The brothel system has resolved itself into -a traffic so ex- tensive. as to meet with the same consideration of competi- tion that all other schemes of women have had to meet at the hands of men. Yet how seldom do we find either the male keeper of the bagnio or the man prostitute arraigned before the police court to answer to charges that are criminating women constantly‘ for the same ofiense. ‘Nhen a city treasury gets low of funds, and the aldermanic gullet needs l7.'qm'd—at'£ng, it requires only a suggestion to the faithful ( ?_) watch-dogs of social safety, and who, belted and clubbed, are a section of the official “ring,”'to arouse awhole district of “necessary evils” from their slumbers, and, half- clad, rush them to the stations -to await trial. Breaikfastless and shivering with terror and consciousness of conviction, it is all the same to them whether they plead guilty or not guilty. There is a fine to pay or the bridewell or workhouse in prospect. The police and justices know their customers so well as to be able to measure their purses by the run of patronage they have had; and graduate their fines to the full- est extent of their abilityto pay. The lobby sharks, professional vultures (who live off‘ the speculations of such generosity and their winning bets), who are as ever present at police courts as reporters and lawyers, are prompt to catch the significance of an exorbitant fine that cannot be met, and they offer, for a consideration of ‘perhaps double the amount, to pay the fines, and so the \ money goes into the pocket of the fat oficer, , while the woman goes to her haunt of desolation to wait till the wheel of. circumstances brings around the ofiice-holder to her door, who, “ for value received,” pays back again a fraction of the . previous fine which avirtuous court and a virtuous people required him to exact qf the outlawed. women. And this system of “pulling” the houses of professional‘ prostitutes resolves itself into such repetitions as this, till . there is little left but the scantiest outfit in the rooms of the harlot, who knows not how to protect herself from the ag- gressions that arepracticed upon her, nor the possible road from her present ills to a better position. Both are to her seem- ing impossibilities, and she chooses rather to bear the ills she has than to fly to others that she knows not of. Since society is so bitter and discriminatory in regard to receiving these prostitutes in its iniinaculate midst, and offering them recognition and support in more choice and honored vocations, and since it is for the security of society’s chaste women and to the necessities of society’s wisest men I that these women become subject, it is time their voice ' should be raised unitedly against outrages continually made upon their liberties, their property and their persons. Let these women know their power in the land and once strike together for justice, and society will be made to feel the blow. I They should form themselves into a Magdalen Protective Union,and be ready to stand by each other in de- fense of each other and their own’ interest. If the Magdalens in the country were to unite, form them- selvesinto a combined organization with the determination to resist such contemptible injustice as is daily thrust upon them by arrests made for no other purpose than to rob them, and unjust taxation when they are arrested and fined; and were they to stand up and demand proofs of the charges and insist on the equal answer and commitment of their male associates, and resist to the utmost any crimination without proper testimony, theywould soon changethe tide of oppres- sion at least a little from pursuit Of them- And again, when the social evil is said to be regulated by j the license system, let them insist on the registry of the ‘men prostitutes who visit them, and let, each hostess keep a book of record and each visitors name be placed ‘upon its ‘pages each occasion of his visit. No doubt this new order of things would reveal some astounding facts and perhaps oc- casion some dissent among the men. But then they might not be ashamed to let it .be known that they are patrons of institutions their votes and influence have made legal—oh 1101 Again, it might be urged by the Magdalens themselves that this system would effectually break up their business. Well, to such as are in earnest in§their protest and disgust for the business and their longing to get away from it, I would say you can well afford to lose your present vocation if by the less an equality is recognized and a better vocation con- sequently ready for your a008l3t‘&fl03- . Still, thereare other reasons that oifer themselves as more ’ objectionable to the traffic than seems apparent by the bare suggestions preceding. Said a Magdalen in answer to a query the other day: “' Why, the times are fearfully hard upon us now, and getting worse all the time. You may not know it, but the facts are, the respectable married women are takingour custom away from us. They don’t even patronize the assignation houses as they used to, for every one who inclines makes it convenient to- receive her guests at home.” _ Had these Magdalens have felt assured of the co-operative ‘ strength and sympathy of women of position in society in the furtherance of their protective interests, they had long ago defied the mob rule of these pseudo maintainers of the A public peace and good morals. And. right here I want to say , to my unfortunate sisterhood, that there is already 3 noble band of women who have pledged themselves to aid them in such a proposed protective union. M The Magdalens, too,. are, so far as consulted, ready to unite, and there is a determination and zeal manifested in their willingness to co-operate that means success. As also there is a fixed decision on the part of the women outside to work for their protection under the laws that now so un- justly oppressthem. if The work of emancipation meets always with a tide of op- position, but the wheel of justice and the right never turns backward on its axis. The work of woman’s emancipation does not pause to take breath nor look back when it over- takes a prostitute. By and by I hope to ‘be able to more fully report progress. Meantime the co-operation by sug- gestion, sympathy or assistance in the work, either from the Magdalens themselves or women brave enough outside their lists to favor the movement, is solicited. Already letters that would touch the sympathy and excite the admiration of the most prejudiced have drifted intomy hands from_the women in whose behalf the work has been inaugurated. * Address Addie L. Ballou, Terre Haute, lnd. MARRIED, BUT NOT A WIFE. BY MICHAEL SCANLON. Oh, pity the woman sold—- Sold unto death in life—— Wedded to lust and gold- , Married, but not a wife! . Think of the wild unrest * When the sleepless passions rave, With her head on her husband’s breast ’ And her heart in her lover’s grave. Under the starlight—old, Sweet, dim lights of love- The mystic story was told—— First told in heaven above- Told in the passionate sighs, The low, rich music of love—— ‘ Told by the souliin the eyes- Told by the voice of the dove. Oh, the ecstatic night, Which wrapped as in a dream, With its dim and delicate light, And the drowsy croon of the stream! Why did they ever awake From love’s delicious sleep? , One proud heart to break, The other to live and weep‘! Love has no eyes to see, No watchful ear to hear; Age, with its aches and dree. Has the eyes and ears of fear; And thus the stolen hours t Were missed, and the reveling thieves Were caught in their nuptial bowcrs, In thebliss of the dewy eVes./ She to her altar-doom, ,yVedded to age and place; , E, He td a bloody tomb—— ‘” Child of a plebeian race! Behold her in pallor stand, And pity the social slave, Her hand in her husband’s hand, Her heart in her lover’s grave! Oh, hoary wisdom which weighs Hot blood in your icy marts, Filling yourxwaning days With the ‘grief of broken hearts! Love is but merchandise, A thing to be bought and sold, And the wounded spirit that dies You change into godly gold. Oh, that insatiate things Can waste up the springs of youth! That age, with its sunless wings, Can shroud all the hopes of youth! For love lives only when free, - Dies in a golden cage, And youth is a headlong sea, That breaks on the rocks of age. Sold in the social mart; Wedded to death in life; Acting the woman’s part In “ Marriage without a Wife !” Yet pity the wild unrest, When the sleepless passions rave, With her head on her husband’s breast And her heart in her lover’s grave! THE WIFE MARKET. A raw REMARKS BY A WOMAN. “We ladies had a discussion the other evening, and of course it was about marriage. I contended that of all places, a ball-room was the worst to seek a wife in. Only take an unbiassed view of a modern ba1l—room, where one sex dresses in sober colors, and in such a purely conventional way that the coat, waistcoat and pantaloons of any one man would serve perfectly well for every other of his size, while the other sex displays all the colors of the rainbow, and every one of the richer toilets an amount of study, expense and time that only the initiated can possibly comprehend. Now what does the wise observer understand by such a spectacle? Simply that women are tricked out for sale, while the men are /buyers, who carry their attractions in their purses or in their bank accounts. The question of modesty or immodesty is idle enough; so also is that of morality, for whatever is the general custom will always be moral in the eyes of the majority.”—Day’s Doings, N. Y. {SENSIBLE ADVICE. , V ' i FAIRHAVEN, Mass., January 5, 1874. Dear Weekly--I am an old man, but wish to tell my story. Years gone by, in the city of New Bedford, famous for its business in the whale fishery, a certain young Whaling captain married ‘a beautiful girl, and after the honeymoon was over he embarked on one of those long voyages Of Years your faithful friend. in length. He returned again to the one he loved so dear; but alas, how changed his condition. She to whom he had given his heart and his affections, had been untrue to him. What a sad dilemmal. VVhat course to take he did not know, but concluded he would consult the owner of the ship, the being a’ man of sound /sense and good’ judgment. “ Well,” said the old man, “if you are very sure that in your long ab- sense you have kept yourself pure, I advise you to leave her; ‘ otherwise I advise you to return again to your wife.” It is needless to say he ‘took the latter course. J ONA. Mosnnn. ‘=‘“:~===-,-*-+*‘®*“* ' /in EQUALITY. I Dear WeekZy~I- feel that I confer a favor on the intelli- gent men and women who look eagerly each week for the advent of your paper, by sending you a portion of an ad- dress delivered in behalf of the High School Alumni, of which she is a member, by Miss Margaret F. Buchanan, upon the occasion of the presentation to the Board of Education of the portrait of Professor Cheney, who so bravely fought _ the battle and won the victory which resulted in the admis- sion of girls, upon equal terms with boys, to this institution —-the doors of which had been closed upon them during I the first four years of its existence. , Miss Buchanan is a native of Detroit, and is a living refu- tation of the adage, that “a prophet is not without honor save in his own country.” This lady is now employed upon the Chicago Times, and is one of the most brilliant of it corps of able writers. Her address upon the occasion in question evinces schol- arship, breadth of thought and clearness of perception; but those who read it will of course lose the charm of manner, and the magnetic effect of voice and presence which accom- panied its utterance. . I should have sent you the whole address, but, knowing that your pages are already crowded, I felt that that_ portion which referred to the presentation and to reminiscences of mere local interest might be omitted, leavinggonly that which has a universal application, and, therefore, cannot fail to in- terest those who are watching anxiously for all indications of growth among intelligent and cultured women reputedv conservative. ‘ Miss Buchanan simply reiterates opinions long since euun- ciated by her sisters East and West, but then every radical thought that has found expression in this country, upon in- vestigation, proves to be only the echo of that which furnish- ed the bigotry of a preceding age with a martyr, and the reiteration in this instance is so classic and abounds with allusions to women whose names, though gracing the pages of history, have rarely if ever been cited as illustrations of the validity and justice of our claims, that I cannot but feel that it deserves to be preserved in ‘the paper whose weekly visit I hail with such genuine pleasure. I am surrounded by the most rigid conservatism. The few persons in this city who are supposed to be tolerant of pro- gressive‘ thought, only tolerate it, and I could not be more completely isolated from those with whose views I sympa- thize if I lived in New Zealand, and I should enjoy advan- tages of climate that I do not possess here. Those, however, who still hold me in remembrance may be assured that every pulse of my heart beatstrue to the principles I have so long advocated, and that in my temporary exile I take diligent note of the signs of the times, and am, as of yore, their and LAURA Curry SMITH. DETROIT, Jan. 5, 1874. ‘ The following is an extract from the address alluded to above, and delivered on the evening of January 3d, by Miss Margaret F. Buchanan, before the Board of Education of the Detroit High School: The school was then, as I am sure it has continued to be, singularly free from petty jealousies, from those contempti- ble distinctions which poverty and riches, social position, sex, nationalty and religion create inpresumably higher and clearer spheres. No laurel ‘was ever earned by any student of the High School in those days whom all the rest would not have been delighted to crown. The boys will quickly re- spondmto the assertion that the girls made as profitable a use of its course of study as they have done, and have reflected as much lustre on the institution. Two of these girls snatched the honors of Vassar College from hundreds of young ladies trained in Eastern houses where Latin and Greek lie like soap around the house. Another became a teacher of French and German in this school, and is now assisting in the civil- izing of a principality of pedantic young savages at Ann Arbor. A fourth, Hattie Goodell, had achieved an enviable reputation in the art school at Philadelphia, when the palette fell from her hands into those of death. A few dozen have entered that crowded thoroughfare of the sex, teach- ing, and are heroically wearing away for a few hundred a year without the right to strike. One is now engaged in the medical schools of the Continent, acquiring that superior skill and knowledge which will enable her to return to the city where her father paid heavy taxes, and accept in exchange the cowardly snub of the local medical society. The largest number have entered that first, last, highest and noblest profession of woman, motherhood; and the ruddy-checked children, born of their strength and intelligence, will be taught the lesson which too many of the sons of the last generation failed to acquire, namely, that their mothers are their fathers’ intellectual peers. If the intellectual ‘equality of men and women were now undisputed; if,in its debate, prejudice and supP0S€d ‘Wadi- tion were not offered in place of reason and argument; if woman’s labor were not still reckoned less valuable than man’s, with no regard for the skill, the education and the necessities of the former, or the igI101'3i110e and 130131 degra- dation of the latter; if all the means of livelihood were open to men and women on equal terms ; if a large portion of the best element in the ‘community did not look upon the , ctwovman movement” with timid apprehension or open alarm»; if the Church, blindto its own history, deaf to the most eloquent voices from its great universities and deepest / I. 1-‘-4‘ - Fur» ,1 l 3. l xi 3 «Jan. 31, 1874. :§WOO.DHULL &.\CLAFLIN’S WEEKLY, , ‘ 7 . cloisters, did not misconceive what women desire, its obtuse’ ministers ‘confusing terms and spreading over the whole body of virtuous, aspiring women theiinauseous odium en- gendered by a few bold and wicked of the sex; if the women in the teachers’ profession were not shamefully underpaid, and those in law and medicine escaped patronizinglpity and malicious sneer, it would be unnecessary for me to answer the key-note of thought which this occasion irresistibly sug- gests. But I would surely be ungrateful for the privileges of these class-rooms, and a coward in the picket—guard of my sex if, fearing the misjudgment of pious censorswho daily disclaim a parody on Christianity, and who use the potenti- alities of the religious office for the enforcement of their private opinions as authorized doctrine, if I failed to declare to-night calmly, and with the utmost respect for those who dissent from us, what I know to be the opinion of the gradu- ates of the school concerning the grievously misunderstood question of “ woman’s rights.” , We conceive them to be essentially three: The right to equal education; the right to unrestricted labor in all the professions and occupations for which they fit themselves’; the right to the same pay as men ‘for the same service rendered. Do these demands shock morality? Is danger lurking in them, waiting to assail the marriage tie and disrupt domes- tic peace? Will the children born of mothers holding these principles be more brutal or less modest than those of women who cannot read or write, or of that other class who are per- mitted to attain the rudiments and Whodevote their leisure to slander and malignity and society vices? VVill paying "a woman the same sum of money as a man for doing the same work, in the same way, in the same length of time, shock God’s sense of justice? If a man receive $1,500 a year as principal of a school, and a woman be appointed to the place and the work, will the foundations of the universe cry out in pain that chaos will come back if she be paid $1,500? What is there in these three demands—equal education, unre- stricted labor, equal pay~——which is not in accord with human reason, with moral equity, with Christianity? What human being outside an insane asylum dare, deny them? None, say we all to-night! But to-morrow, when some woman applies for the privilege of studying medicine, some cautious man will warn her through the press or from the pulpit, and when she answers, that God made the human body, that it is the temple of the Holy Ghost, that all things are pure to the pure, and the shame be to him who evil thinks, he will loftiiy decline to continue the correspondence on the ground that his opponent is a woman, that he does not like to be hard on the weak, and that he is a gentleman of the old school! , These gentlemen of the old school would not like to have their sisters study medicine, or practice at the bar. They always have something to say about their sisters when they want to keep women out of diversified occupations, and by bringing their sisters to the fore they fancy the argument is clinched, These dogmatic shepherds forget that their sisters are comfortably provided for, while there are many Women who have no brothers to provide for them in any manner, and who prefer to earn their bread rather than accept it as a public or private gift. Let these fortunate gentlemen of the old school continue to provide for their sisters in eleemosy- nary ease and the luxury of the collection plate; but let the gentlemen of the new school qualify other people’s sisters to take care of themselves, and do it through better agencies than scrubbing floors or supplying institutions of sin, or starving in the crammed and famished ranks of sewing- woinen. Horace Greeley fought the woman suifragists so per- sistently and quixotically that he would not permit Elizabeth Cady Stanton to be so called in the New York Tribune, but invariably alluded to her in the presumably subordinate role of Mrs. Henry W. Stanton. But he understood this question of labor thoroughly, and said: “ N 0 amount of preaching, exhortation, sympathy or benevolence will render the con- dition of our working-women what it should be so long as the kitchen and the needle are substantially their only re- sources.” There is a curious insect which furnishes a Wonderful pre- sentiment of the nice, dainty, successful woman gossip. It is the colcopteron or whirligig. The nice, dainty gossip is rarely “caught,” nor is the Whirligig. It has several pairs of eyes, some directed up, some down, so that, floating along the surface, it sees the fish which menaces it from the depths, and the bird that threatens to swoop down upon it. It pi- rouettes hither and thither, sparkling like diamonds, seeing everything above, everything below, and is too agile for de- ’ tection. Each of us knows several pretty whiligigs, especially around the churches. The woman the gentleman of the old school prefers a sister is the litellula or Oregon fly. Origi- 113113’ it 18 311 ignoble larva, slimy andcovered with mud, , wiggling on marine bottom. - That is the typical savage wo- man, the Spartan helot, an Eastern concubine. A chivalric gentleman of the old school would not have such a woman in his society; so the litellula mounts an aquatic plant, casts oh its slimy gown, spreads irridescent wings of gauze and flies away, a » pretty, graceful, good-for-nothing butterfly—the “ sister” of the gentleman of the old school. He forgets that the new creature is only the old with its dress changed; that his peaceful, graceful, genteel lady is but the metamorphosed slave of Greece, the sullied Vestal of the empire, the brutal ‘ woman of Goth, the degraded drudge who, in Germany, is yoked with a donkey to the plow, both driven by a whip in the husband’s hands, who prefers his wife in the 1a,va form, Another class of men prefer beautiful, silent women, worthy of exhibition on certain occasions, and wholly incapable of saying anything. Another class ramble into horticulture, and seek their favorite ladies, like Tennyson, in a. garden. Here is Walter Savage Lander, assuring himself that “wo- men, like plants, find their softness and tenderness in the shade.” Dothe Sisters of Charity and Mercy, onthe blaz- ing. Crashing battle-field, derive their softness from the shade? Many of these are bronzed like Crimean veterans- the browner the tenderer. It would be delightful for women if they were all blossoming vines, twined around sturdyand maJ'6Sti0 03ék_S.“0ak and vine lovingly branching out together Alas, we are not vines; you are not oaks! Life is not a met- aphor! VVe all have to travel the high road of activity, fac- ing the sun, blinded by the dust, elbowed and pushed by the crowd, drenched by the rain! She is the tenderest woman who can bear the greatest tempests without yielding. To be tender is something else than to be frail! An Englishman, who was a jurist when he wrote of law and less than a man when he talked of woman, says, “A woman’s noblest station is retreat.” The Shah of Persia, on his recent visit to the noble lord’s country, slapped the noble lord’s-spirit on the shoulder, and practically indorsed the opinion by oflering $30,000 for three women to decorate his retreat at Teheran. lt was a Frenchman who exclaimed: “To describe woman the pen. should be dipped in the humid colors of the rainbow, and the paper be dried with dust gathered from the wings of a butterfly.” Think of describing Susan B. Anthony that way! “The empire of woman,” writes another Frenchman in fact, if not in country, “is an empire of softness, of address, of complacency. , Her commands are caresses, her menaces are tears.” Ah, the real Woman, the woman whom God intended to be by the side of man during the morning, the noon, the night of his existence, to be his equal, his love, his wife, is not the woman of heathen Greece, or the grovel- ing grub of later degradation, is not the gaudy insect nor the Frcnchman’s passionate plaything. The real woman is as di- vine—the product of the same divinity in heart and brain and soul—as he. She has to bear equallythe toil of life, the heat and burden of the day; and they who would deprive her of any means whereby she may bear the burden better, are rob- bers and pirates! . The highest education makes man no- blest; so does it make woman. The most practical education makes man usefulest; so does it make woman. The ’finest education makes man tenderest; so does it make Woman, Whauever contributes to the intellectual greatness, the moral worth of the one, enlarges the intellect and beautifies the character of the other. ' ‘ But the prevalent idea that this demand for the equal ed- ucation of men and women is a new one—a revolutionary demand—is the most absurd of the unreasonable notions connected with this question. The demand is for a revival, not for a novelty; for restoration, not for revolution. Lioba, a nun of the eighth century, taught civil and canon law, the- ology and philosophy, with the admiration and indorsement of the bishops. Hildegarde, a German abbess of Bingen-on- the-Rhine‘, was called the Saint Bernard of women, on ac- count of her sanctity and eloquence. Women studied in the great Catholic university schools of the Middle Ages, side by 'side with men; yet hands are raised in detestation over the inroad of women at Ann Arbor. Not only did girls study in these university schools, but women held professorships there. Novella D’Andrea taught canon law, in the Univers- ity of Bologna for ten years. Her father was the eminent canonist, and she succeeded to the chair. _ In 1579 Christina Pasani was professor of jurisprudence there. Lauro Bassi, whose profound scholarship obtained the university degree of doctor of laws, was appointed professor of mathematics and natural philosophy, in 1732, and taught in the Univers- ity of Rome, as well as in that of Bologna. laymen and good women lament aloud about heresy, and novelty, and revolution, when women apply for admission to Oxford and Cambridge! What terror is there not, what con. tumely, what astonishment, when women sit under the same clinical lectures with men! Did the world ever hear of any- thing so frightful? It certainly did, for French, Italian and German girls studied medicine in the University of Bologna, side by side with them, and women, as well as men, gave the medical lectures! One of the most distinguished doctors and lecturers on anatomy was Anna Morandi, who, first a stu- dent, was named to the professor’s chair in 1760. Her learn- ing and fame were not limited to one city. She was invited to Milan, to London, to St. Petersburg. This University of Bologna, like the cotemporaries, was a Papal institution, di- rectly under the guidance of Roman Catholic prelates. It was founded in the fifth century, and restored by Charm- magne, and held so high aplace in Europe that 10,000 stu- dents were in attendance at one time. In it was established the first school for the dissection of the human body, and many. of the women who practiced medicine in France in the fourteenth century must have been its graduates. Its benches and professors’ chairs were not filled at long inter- vals, and for a brief period by women—theY were there un. interruptedly from the twelfth century to the nineteenth. And it is called novel and dangerous for women to seek what the sex had for over 700 years! When Cardinal Mezzo- fanti, the greatest linguist of his age, died, a woman, Matilda Tamborina, was found most competent to succeed him. It is to be understood, also, that during the centuries when wo- men were students and professors in the whole range of sci- ence, sacred and profane, these Universities of Rome, Bo- logna and Genoa were under the absolute control, political as well as religious, of the Papacy. Yet Roman Catholic clergymeneverywhere insist on the necessity of frivolous education of girls as the only kind fit for them, and Game. lics who entertain contrary opinions are called upon to de- fend themselves. Statues are erected to the memory of we- men professors of botany in Bologna and Genoa; and sculp- ture and painting were taught by the sisters Givani, and by Propezia di Rossi and Maretta Robusti. 1 How shall we forget that illustrious woman and’ saint, Catherine of Sumia, the noblest of the many Catherines who tread the boards of history! She was not only a jurist, but a. diplomat; not only a canonist, but a politician. For her, public services in these capacities, the Church was .131-0.,‘ Popes summoned her to their counsel. She was the legate of Gregory XI. to negotiate and accept foundly grateful. the surrender of the rebellious city of Avignon. During the schism which followed the election of Pope Urban VL, she pacified Christendom. And in civil and political success in her learning and courageand eloquence, the\Church has con- ferred upon her the highest earthly reward—canonization. Surely I have already sustained my seemingly ill-founded assertion, that the demand for Women’s highest education _ Only 150 years have passed—-she is forgotten; and English clergymen and’ ——for the enlargement of her sphere“-—is a revival, not an in- novation. The proofs can be freely extended; my remarks must not be. Let me sum it all——history, common sense, Christianity——in a single sentence: The sphere of» woman is the field wherein she can best use her faculties. » ’ ln my allusions to the Board of Education, whose presi- dent. superintendent and leading members so honor the positions they hold, I do not desire to be partial or uncandid. Corporate bodies are only representativ_e. They cannot be radical in policy [or final jurisdiction. , They must be exactly what public sentiment permits, and it is public sen- timent,~not the Board of Education, that needs reform. It is their sworn duty to obtain the best labor that the market afiords for the least price that will buy it. There arejso few profitable occupations open to the young women of Detroit that they flock like sheep into the teacher’s profession, and if the board reduce the first yearfs salary to‘ $100 they will still have more teachers than places-. ’ The unanswerable complaint which may he made, is that when the board buys skill it does not pay the same rates to a woman as to a man for it. It compels her -to deduct 25.to 50 per cent., because God made her a woma, A but will tolerate no corresponding defi- cit " in class resu 1 "and school discipline. The board may allege that they merely buy the cheapest; the truth is, they buy the best, and are bound to buy the best; then they play Shylock with its necessities.,%The ballot, in my judgment, is only a means to an end. ‘Most women are undoubtedly gladito be» rid of it‘ on one day in the year, and that election day. They are glad to be free from the responsibility of electing the worst men to the best places; of exercising the sublime function of an American citizen for a park alder- man. ' But, wink at‘ it as we.will, I am forced to the convic- tion that if women voted, the persons who administer pub- lic service would be chosen upon the principle that work is to be paid for and sex is not to be mulcted in damages. Al- ready in many of the States women are legally entitled to to hold theoifices for which they are peculiarly fitted; and under your admirable new constitution they are eligible to school pinspectorship. The places now filled upon the board by incompetent men will ultimately be filled, let the oracles say what they may, by competent women. When that time comes, and may Providence speed it, the balance of wages will be readjusted. Then male principals will not be voted $1,800 and the female principal $800; Both will re- ceive the $1,800; and the election of women on the board will do more to hasten. this simple and long-delayed justice than years of unorganized wordy warfare and thespasmodic perpetration of,ridicu1ous revolts. What, if, after the adop- of the new constitution, men will not elect competent wo- men to the board? One step at atime, and the best foot for- ward! If, after the adoption of the new constitution, when women may legally hold these places, men will not elect them, then I see but one alternative. Women must step down from their pedestal, take up their burden, do their duty them- selves, since menwill not do it for them, and vote. EDUCATE THE LITTLE ONES. . FARMINGTON, Minn., J an. 1, 1874. A grand and glorious work you are doing with your voice and pen. Many hungry souls read your WEEKLY and are filled with the bread of life. What a glorious cause you have undertaken and what a mighty work is going on for the truth and the emancipation of the humanfisoul! Would there were more Victories in the field; but alas! we stand back trembling with fear of what we do not know, and;instinctive- ly shrink from some shadow we have carried with us from childhood. This last idea teaches usqwe must educate the ‘little ones, throw around them such influences as will imbue them with the truth. ’ Why is it that reformers have so long neglected this their - first duty? Yes, we have lyceums; but you will find they are only echos of the old school system. You will find the same would—be respectable spirit creepingin there; they are afraid they will lose themselves or their land-marks. We want radical reform’ schools for our children: we can bend the twig but n/6t the tree. ’ i Yours for progress and truth, , Mas. FANNIE E. Ramon. A CLODHOPPER AND GRANGER ON THE SITUA- TION- . i For two years Ihave been a reader of the WEEKLY, and am fully satisfied that the majority of Mrs. Woodhullfs op- ponents need a thorough cold-water treatment of the organ of self-esteem, all being purely too selfish _and narrow- minded. Any one that accepts the doctrine of universal progression must accept her teachings, whether they accord .. with our politics or religion. Change is inevitable in all things, so all might as well march on to the end. 0 I am not a public man at all, but I’ am satisfied that my- ’ opportunities for observing the manners and customs of modern society has been equal to the majority of persons. Living in two quarters of the globe, and working in all grades ofisociety, from the yard-stick. and scales to the factory and the plow, on railroads ,,and ,in the bowels of the earth; and for thirty-five years I have been a constant reader of the most radical publications of the age. After summing up, if I speak the truth I must admit that Mrs. Woodhull’ gives as much truth and sound practical sense as the majority of writers and speakers, ‘and no other? man or woman with a thinking brain ‘but what will say the same, and condemn as follows: Our Rotten Government and all its Branches; the Marriage Rigmarole; the ,Modern System of ‘Night-sparking; Night Recreations of .,all kinds; Priesthood an_d,Churches; the Medical Fraternity; those Hornets the Lawyers; Taxation Mucldle; "' and“ lastly and ;_above all, the- present manner of talking and jesting upon the.’ organs of gener- c ation. Who with a spark of genuine love in them would . repeat the Goarse Jests that are bandied around how among all classes of society? r~ I V ‘ . , _ . Before athing can be treated aright it must be reverenced and worshiped. Let all that believe in the brotherhood. of the race worshipat the throne of Venus, for it is the Gate of Life and the Door of Salvation. ‘ ' So says and thinks J, BUXTON, ...,____ , ..‘\» , .) _» Ms , ‘ - ”WooDHULL& CLAFLIN”S WEEKLY? 1, Jan; 31, 1874. , TERMS or SUBSCRIPTION. I S - L /PAYABLE ADVANCE. . One copy for one year, - , $3 00 One copy for six months, - - - - - . 1 50 Single copies, - - .- - 1- - - - 10 CLUB RATES. Five copies for one year, - - - - - - $12 00 Ten copies for one year, - - .- - - - - 22 00 Twenty copies (or more at same rate) - - 2 40 00 - - - 1 - - ' One-half these rates. Six months; - - ‘ FOREIGN SUBSCRIPTION - CAN BE MADE TO THE AGENCY OF THE AMERICAN NEWS COMPAl{‘f.'., LON- DON, ENGLAND, tine copy for one year, - - - - . - - $4 00 tme copy for six months, -= - - - -’ "- 2 00 D RATES or ADVERTISING. .F'iE«i (according to location), - From $1 o0 to $2 58 Special p'.~..~;.;:e .9; advertising columns cannot be permanently given. - .l5;dve1*tls5::~“ '~_/ills will be collected from the office of this journal, and must in all cases, bear the signature of WOODHULL & CLAELIN. Specimen _c@pies sent free. - NeWsd.ca.?ors supplied by the American News Company, No. 121 Nassau ' treet, New York. All communications, business or editorial, must be addressed Woodhull cc czaflews‘ Weekly, O Box 3791. New York City. “The diseases of s0et'e~ty can, no more than cor‘- poreal maladies,’ be prevented or cm-eel wet/tout being spoken about plain lan.guage.”—-JOHN STUART MHLL. s NEW YORK, SATURDAY, JAN. 31, 1874. ..,. 1 H3‘ - CHANGE OF ADDRESS. , Hereafter; all communications for the paper, Whether business or otherwise, should be addressed to WOODHULL & GLAELr1v’s WEEKLY, box 3,791 New York City. 1 Postal orders should also be made payable to Woodhull & Claflin. A‘ 4 r ‘aha our: DOWN TOWN OFFICE. For the convenience of’ publication andiof our friends in the business part of the city, We have established an oflice at No. 111 Nassaustreet, Room 9. Q+wd RENEW I RENEW I ! Clubs that expire in the coming two or three months should begin to move in thematter of renewals. Those who__interested themselvesayear ago in getting them up, and who thus rendered usso valuable" a service, will put us and all friends of: human progress under -additional obligations by again interesting themselves about the renewals, and in adding new names to the lists of last year. So far the WEEKLY has suffered less from the panic than almost any 1 other paper of which we have any knowledge. Some secu- lar Weeklies have fallen ofi one-half in the last six months; p but the WEEKLY holds its own, has even gained in regular subscriptions since the panic set in. Now, if our club agents will but be active in returning renewals, we shall begin the year under the most favorable circumstances.‘ 4; A r 1wr-w LECTURE ENGAGEMENTS. ~._..-.—___. Victoria C. Woodhull has been engaged to deliver lectures I in the cities named below, on the dates specified. We would request our readers in the vicinity of these places to apprize their friends of this opportunity of hearing her: -- Jacksonville, Ill.,, ’. . - . . Jan. 23. Springfield, “ ._ . . . f‘ V 24. . Decatur, ‘ ‘ . . - L . “ 26. Bloomington, “ .- ., .' . “ 27. Peoria, 2 “ . . . . . ‘ “ _ 28. Freeport, ‘S “ . . . - “ 29- Dubuque, iowa, . . ./’ . : “ 30. Davenport, _“ , , 1 1 _ , ‘.‘ 31. Janesville, Wis.,~ , . . . . Feb. ‘ 3. Madison, “ , , ‘ I. ,, “ 4. Ira Crosse, , “ 1 ,. , I ., , . “ 5. "Winona, Minn., . ., . ' . “ 6. Eaul, -“ , . ' , . , “ '7. Te: £3. Claflin accompanies Mrs. Woodhull, and will make appointments to lecture at places contiguous to the route given above. A ' ~~.z1 THE EVOLUTION Oll‘ THOUGHT. The theory of evolution as opposed to that of special crea- tion has become the generally accepted idea of the World, especially in its more advanced intellectual circles. There are too many evidences on every hand to permit the thought- ful mind to believe that, for every different order of nature, there has been a special creative decree proceeding from a general creative centre; While the accumulative facts of science, are positive demonstration that nature in all her parts has observed a regular order of progressive develop- ment. In other Words thescientific attainments of man neg- ative /the proposition of the religionszof the past which have been based upon the idea of a personal God; and if they do anything, rather go to substantiate the materialistic theory that God and Nature are one and the same, or at least that He is the life of Nature—the force everywhere found in matter. But this again in reality confirms the most im- portant of all the religiousideas—that God is omnipotent and omnipresent—Which He could be, only as the life-principle, the interior motor power of the World—everyWhere present and all powerful, which ideas are entirely incompatible With that of a personal God residing at some given place in - the universe. Following, a prion’, the evidences deduced by scientific investigation into the orders of growth or development, the inquirer arrives at a time when matter existed in ele- mental form, Whcnthere were no two of the recognized primal elements combined, or else when all matter was a . common element filling space_“‘Witl1out form and void.” It should" be distinctly borne ini, mind that to this conclusion only can the scientificx mind arrive; and also that scientific V investigation is every day becoming a matter of ' greater im- portance and of more general zlcccptance. Where Was God at this era of the universe? Clearly, everywhere present and all-powerful, Working todevelop Wll3.t:n0W is from What then Was. Still there is nothing more now either of matter or spirit, or power, "or God, if you Will, than there was then. The difference between then and now is this: the power that resided in the-elements at that time has, through a long process of rearrangement arfd readjustment, produced the various material forms of the present, but added nothing to the sum total of matter or power. What Was, still is, difier- ing in form and arrangement only. , 1 The theory of material evolution is founded upon these propositions. Indeed, were it not for them there‘ could be no scientific solution of creation; there could be no material science Whatever.; no recognized first principles; no biology; no psychology; no sociology. It is, however, a well estab- lished and generally recognized fact that there is a source of life, and it is come to be equally as Well established and recognized, that there is also a science of society; that society evolves according to laws fixed and eternal in the very constitution of nature itself, and that all the seeming A discord and anarchy among the peoples of thelworld are natural and necessary results of the processes of develop- ment, of growth. ’ » But along with all these facts which ‘scientific investiga- tion has discovered to the world of mind, there follows a certain series of corrollaries of which there has been but little, if anything, ever Written or said; and this is in regard to science itself. If all the subjects of scientific analysis are themselves subjects of the law of evolution, so also the several sciences based/upon the law of evolution are also subject to , the law. In other Words, thought itself is subject to the law of evolution; and the ‘systematiz/ed thought of to-day, the science of the present, is just as necessarily a result of the doctrine of evolution as is the material universe; indeed, it is the inevitable accom- panyment of . its evolution, and with each succeeding step in material progress, finding higher and more complex ex- pressions in mind. , But from What has the highly refined and complex thought of the present developed? Clearly from the ele- mental principles that existed when Matter was “Without form and void.” There has been nothing new created any more in the realm of ideas than in the universe of matter; therefore, as the physical World is the result of a long-contin- ued process of rearrangement and readjustment of the pri- mary elements of ‘matter, so also is the mental universe the result of thesame processes among the elements of thought; and thus the civilization of the World has kept exact pace with the evolution of its material forms, and thus it will ever . do the same. - S L - There is a lesson to be drawn from these facts, however, which the religious world will be as slow and as unwilling to accept as it has been to adopt the theory of material evo- lution in opposition to that of a special creation. The “Whatever is, is right” theory is anatural corollary to that of natural evolution, because, not anything can be conceived of that is not the necessary result of the causes and circum- stances out of which it grew; and this is equally as true of all thought and action in individuals as it is of all phenom- ena and forms inNature. , The search after God, then, is the same thing as the search for the scientific solution of the facts which are found in matter"; indeed, to find one is also to find the other. What and where is Grod,*is answered Whenever a manner in which - matter is evolved is discovered. God is the spirit, the force residing in matter, everywhere present, and sufiiciently powerful to-forever carry it forward from lower to higher and higher gradation. God, then, as conceived of, in con- } tradistinction to Nature, is the element in Naturethat evolves in thought; and as the highest forms of matter are the nearest to perfection in form, so also are the highest forms of thought the nearest to God, who is the Whole. In this scnsefit is easy to conceive that'God is “ the same yesterday, to-day and forever,” since, scientifically, He is no more or no less now than When all the elements, both of matter and thought, were in their original, primal condition. Conceive of matter as having evolved from that chaotic condition, and it has ' been virtually conceived that What is known as God has also evolved from the same condition, because all there was of Him was, though concealed, the moving force of matter, from which thought, now systematized as civiliza- tion, has evolved. _ , In thisgview of the affairs of the World the logical mind «must at once see that every new thought that is born into the realm of mind, and every new movement of reform that is born of such thought, is inevitable, because it is the re- sult of the action of fixed and immutable laws acting in natural methods through the various channels of matter and mind. It is as Wise to denounce new mcthodsnof thought as it would be to do the same by improved methods of matter; nevertheless the World almost invariably encourages and welcomes the latter, While it as invariably tramples the for- mer under its iron heels, ‘and endeavors to destroy it, prefer- ring to remain in the enj oymcnt of the present rather than to trust to that which must be, as the scientist and philoso- pher knows, ncarer perfected fruit. ’ /There is also in this view of things the utmost encourage- ment for the most advanced ideas of the World. Their promulgators and advocates may rest assured that the latest form which thought assumes is the highest in the order of evolution. Moreover, it must be known that the latest births in the realm of mind could no more have been, until all that have preceded it,wcre, than the last and highest example of form could have been without all its antecedent causes. And as corollary to this, that the oldest are the crudcst ideas, and inasmuch as they contain the fewest and worst arranged elements of thought, they will be the first to crumble before the weight of advancing civilization. If these things are so, which they must be, else the theory of evolution altogether is false, it is easy to understand Why civilization advances rapidly or slowlyin proportion to the degree of general association among the people having dif- ferent ideas. It is the combination, rearrangement or read- justment of the thoughts held by various people that pro- duces the more advanced ideas. It is also easy to see why it is that progress in thought is so slow among those people who associate only with those holding similar views, and why it is so rapid among people who listen to and read the- ories and ideas different from their own} It is nearly a nat- ural impossibillty for several different ideas of the same thing to be brought together in comparison, Without there being, as a result, some modification of the views of the per- sons severally holding them. Hence theiwisdom of socie- ties cngaging speakers who are known to hold opposite or difierent, or new and not-understood ideas. No person can presume to have attained all the knowledge there is to be had; and hence, for any person to assume that another whom they do not understand, is advocating error, is only exhibiting his or her own ignorance. So also is the method generally adopted by Spiritualists, of engaging different speakers for limited periods, much to be preferred to that of “settled teachers,” because the people have the benefit of the attainments of various, rather than of single individuals. That this transient method is rapidly coming in vogue is another evidence still of the increasing rapiditywith which civilization is evolving; While the consideration of similar ideas simultaneously by large bodies of the people speak in unmistakable language that the Brotherhood of Man, in something more than a theoretical sense, is soon to be recog- nized by the morc advanced civilizations of the world; fol- lowing which, again, will come a universal government, or one organization for all the peoples and races. , But to return to the subject of the evolution of thought: When it shall come (as it must) to be generally recognized, that civilization is a subject of evolution, the new and high developments of thought will receive the kindest and tender- est care of the people, such as they now give to the highest developments of all things, except to ideas and society itself; and thus will civilization roll onward, not only with an ever- increasing volume of power, but also with an ever—accclcr- ating rapidity. H 0+-4 _MRS. W0 ODHUL'L’S SPEECHES. THE ELIXIR or LIFE; on, WHY no WE Dirt ?——The extra- ordinary demand for this pamphlet has already consumed two large editions; but another is now ready, and all de- mands for it Will be promptly supplied. Single copies, twenty-five cents, or six for a dollar. Beside this, We also have on hand Mrs. Woodhull’s latest speech, “Reformation or Revolution, Which? or, Behind the Political and Social Scenes,” which has created a most profound sensation Wherever it has been delivered: price, ' the same as above. We have also a supply of “The Prin- ciples of Social Freedom,” the original Steinway Hall speech, the introduction to the present social agitation, and the “ Scarecrows of Sexual Slavery.” L Three of any, or any three, of these speeches will be sent, postage paid, for fifty - cents. Send for them for yourselves and friends. and Oil“ culatei them among the opposition, and especially procure their reading by all ministers and doctors in your region. ‘.V.,' we» . - "‘~r‘.$*~ wk . .‘r__ .- Jan. 31, 1874. WOODHULL as CLAFLIN’S WEEKLY. r . 9 WHAT IS THE ISSUE ? We are often asked, in our travels through the country, “What are you fighting so desperately for?” In the claim forisocial, or rather sexual, freedom, most people can see only a claim for sexual license. That so many are in this condition is a strong argument for the, doctrine of the total, natural depravity of human nature, held by the dost-7"z'7m7J9°esi of old theology. When it is assumed that the inauguration of freedom in the social relations will result in a general downward tendency among the people in their sexual moral- ity, it is to assume that there is in the people a natural down- ward tendency, inherent in mankind. These wise ones who do this do not, however, appear to realize that their assump- tions have any effect, except so far as men are concerned. They hold that the women will be the same nonentities in the new condition that they are in the present marriage rela- tion, without the power, if they have the right, to any voice in the matter. But the women of the country ought to hurl this insinuation back in the teeth of its enunciators; and We do so hurl it, because it assumes, virtually, that the sexual relations belong to men wholly, or else that Women, having obtained freedom, will naturally go to the bad; ‘or again, that women now are only restrained fro_m descending to the lowest sexual depths of debauchery, by the restraints of the law, while men, who now exercise the same freedom, will only descend lower than they are, on account of the delete- rious influences of women upon them. Again we hurl the base insinuation in the teeth ofthese pharisaical men, and ask the women who tacitly assent to their position for once to rise a few degrees in their woman- hood and resent the insult. We not only repulse this assault upon the honor of women, but we return the charge and declare that the vileness which these male dictators pretend to see coming to women in freedom has existence only in themselves. The drunken man thinks he knows that all persons except himself are drunk. The licentious man , thinks every person, and especially every woman, to be as licentious and as debauched sexually as he is himself; while those who are really pure in heart, see purity of soul in all, rather than whatever debauchery that may attach to them. We said that objectors to sexual freedom for women pre- tend to see in it only demoralization for the community from women having acquired what men already possess. They do not see beyond the more question of the freedom to do - badly; in their philosophy there is no place in freedom for women to become better. They affect‘ not to believe that there is to be any release from slavery for women. Their short-sightedness does not permit them to perceive that with a change from sexual slavery to sexual ‘freedom there must also come a change in the circumstances that have reduced Women to this slavery. The only place there is in the pres- ent social arrangements for women, is to be related’ sexu- ally with men, either i11 or out of marriage‘. In other words, women are sexual slaves whether as wives or otherwise. If wives think they. are not sexual slaves, let them refuse to acquiesce in the demands of their husbands, and most wo- menwill be at once convinced. Indeed, refusal is “ a cause” for divorce. What, then, is marriage, except sexual license‘? Everything that men and women can do, except to have sexual relations, they may do without marriage, and still be “respectable.” Strip marriage of everything that does not ‘belong legitimately to it, and what except sexuality is left‘? Nothing! ' We repeat again then, that in the present social order, women. are virtual sexual slaves whether married or not, and we are fighting for her emancipation from this condi- tion. We protest against any and all law that in any sense, nay, that may even be construed to give to men any power over the bodies of women to which they do not » give willing assent. We claim for our sex that as individu- als they shall own and control the use of their own bodies, and that they shall never be, even seemingly or think they ought to be, compelled to submit to sexual intercourse when not desired by them. The opponents of sexual freedom often say -that we would debase the sexual relations to the level" of the-brutes. They make only a slight mistake in terms. Brutes is good, But instead of debasing them to the level of animals, we would elevate them to their plane. Among animals it is the female who always determines the sexual association. Indeed, so sexually pure (and by purity we mean natural- ness) are the male animals, that they seldom have the sexual desire unless it be excited or called forth by a corresponding . desire in the female. This is what we mean by sexual affin- ity. This is the true and the natural sexual relation. It should first exist in the female, while the emanations proceeding from her should awaken a response in the male to whom she is sexually related, and to no other. If there were no sex- uality in the world except that existing under these con- ditions, who is there who would even dare to assert that’ there could be any debauchery?—and who would dare to V contend that such conditions should not be the subjects of common controversy? Who would dare to assume that there could be anything obscene or vulgar attaching to such controversy? ~ It is to a no less purity than this that sexual freedom tends. The animals run together promiscuously, and they are never debauched, because the female is free. They herd and rest together, andno revolting scenes are enacted. So also should men and women become so sexually puri- fled that they may herd and rest together and never think of exual relations unless there are the same conditions presen t that are their foundation among the “ brutes.” A ' ‘SW8 contend for freedom for women so that they may be sexually pure, and in being so, that they may compel if not induce men to be the same. Were female animals‘ tied to the males by any such arrangements as those by which women are made dependent upon men, the same debauchery and licentiousness would soon pollute the animal kingdom that now debases men and women. As compared with animals, women are the powerless subjects upon whom men vent their morbid, desires, and through them are compelled to unwilling maternityor else to foetal murder, which is so rapidly becoming the rule among wives that it threatens to depopulate the earth; and which have such deleterious effects upon the children that are unfortunate enough to survive the attempts at murder, that one-half of all who are born have not the vigor to endure’ more than five ycars——a com- mentary on our social system. that reduces it to a horrible tragedy, and stamps many a mother’s_brow with the brand of Cain. - . lTh7erefore we are fighting for freedom for woman: first of all that she may become an individual; and secondly, that she may never become unwillingly e7wz7e-ate; and thus re- duced to the necessity of child-murder or else of bearing an undesired child to curse both herself and the world. And we call upon the mothers, in the name of a common humanity to rouse themselves from their present lethargy, and to once and forever throw off the yoke of unwilling motherhood. We do not care what extremes may be necessary to success, since any extreme is not too far if it secure sexual freedom for women. Ifwomen could once be made to realize their real condition, we do not see how they could help instant, rebellion.’ It is this duty‘ that they owe to themselves and ’ to the future generations, that they firmly take the stand that they will never more be sexual slaves, submitting against their wills, against their natures and desires to the sexual demands which marriage endows men with the right -to enforce, and for which woman has no redress except through open rebellion and consequent social ostracism. The present marriage relations are the only ones known that give a man the right to debauch a woman against her will. Opponents may say that the law does not give that right to men, but we say although it does not 111 so many words, its only possible practical ope7"atz'on or interpretation is that it does give it, and the practice under it confirms this view. A I We wish, finally, to assure men that we are not fighting for sexual freedom for women at all in order that they may have their present field of license extended; but that woman may come into the ownership and into the right to give or to withhold the use of her own body, so that she may at least have an opportunity to become sexually pure, which she cannot so long as these rights are denied her. And when men say that in freedom women will become more debauched, we say they lie; and __when women assert the same of their sex, as sometimes they do, we would say: Shame on you that you can hold your sister’s virtues in so low esteem. Vile claim that in freedom only can women be redeemed from the condition of prostituted womanhood . in which she now wallows; and only in such redemption can the world find salvation. ‘ O->——<—--——-———-—- Sunsonrnn FOR THE WEEKLY, even if the panic has drained your small means. This condition has been brought about by our false systems of government——finance, taxation and internal improvements. It is one of the special mis-A sions of the WEEKLY to explode the fallacies and to advo- cate better systems. Read the prospectus in another col- umn, and compare a system based upon its propositions with this one that has culminated in the anarchy and con- fusion that reigns in the country now—-politically, finan- cially, socially. The WEEKLY is devoted to practical meas- ures of reform, and to the elucidation of the principles upon which they must be’ based; and is, therefore, the most im- portant journal published for the merely political reformer; while, besides this, it teaches the married how to remain mated, the children how to avoid the shoals of sexual-vice, and parents how to produce better children; which can be found in no other journal in the world. THE CONDUCT OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS. In our lectures we speak nightly of the disgrace to the country arising from the conduct of the various institutions that society has inaugurated in which to hide its own abortions, or pretendedly to punish and care for the unfor- . tunate. In this list is included States. prisons, penitentiaries, county and cityjails, and all the hospitals or asylums for the insane, and the indigent, and the idiotic. The social system in vogue has made these institutions, as society pre- tends to think, necessary. Indeed, they are an indispensable accompaniment of the system. It cannot exist without pro- ducing large numbers of inmates for all these various places of accommodation, for whom it can provide no other pos- sible place and carry out into practice the theory upon which it is founded. A A These institutions exist, and they are all well filled. The public seems to imagine that with their building and the provisions which have filled, and which keep them well; filled, their duty ends. . They seldom if ever stop to think of the condition of the unfortunate people whom they have. and sisters in Christ, and assume that those in whose charge they are entrusted are doing their duty; are faitl-ifully per- forming their duty as the paid servants of the public; are forgetting that it is not the officials who have the special charge of these classes who are responsible to them for the treatment, but themselves,’ whom these officials represent merely; and if there were to be such an absurd thing as .a future general judgment day, in which so many people——- Christians—pretend to believe, the responsibility \’vould have to be borne by the people and not by their agents. From time to time there are disclosures made about these institutions which are so disgraceful that the people will not believe there is another possible instance, and that “this But let us assure these people that the conditions that only occasionally come to the surface are the rule for all institu- tions and not the exceptions. And the following telegram is not, from our own knowledge, over the average for horror and barbarity: Mnnrnrs-1>oonHoUsE. MEMPHIS, Jan. 8. The report of the Grand Jury Criminal Court to Judge Fellippin, ma<-le to-day, has created considerable excitement. They found the poorhouse and in some instances the patients are;with loathsome diseases in rooms with healthy ones. . The food given is neither good or sufficient in quau tity, while a. total disregard of association of the sexes exist, and an. idiotic female who had been an inmate for five years was found in a state of pregnancy; that the inmates, without regard to sex,’ were kicked , cuffed and whipped with a knotted bull whip and beaten like oxen by Dr. G. G. Hogan and his assistant, Henry A. G1-adley; and, in conclusion, state that the manner in which the poorhouse is governed is a disgrace to the county. Let the people wake up to what is going on in their midst, and go through these institutions and see if these things are not so. They are foul blotches, and are a standing, living, damning impeachment against a :system that makes such things possible and necessary. *'i**~**‘f“”“.‘"' _ PERSONAL. We desire to return our sincere thanks for»the many kind letters that are constantly coming to hand. But our friends who write them will please "remember that we are now /in thefield, speaking every night upon the subject nearest the heart of every real reformer; and traveling every day to reach the next appointment, and consequently that we have little or no time to spend, as has been our wont, and as it would be our pleasure to now do, to make personal replies. We desire, however, that the streams of affection and cheer that flow _in upon us shall continue, so that from them we may gain the strength that is requisite to prosecute the campaign vigorously. - 2 1 ........_*_...,,_¢g. RIGHT ABOUT FACE. For the past eight centuries, or since Charlemagne con- firmed the Pope in the possession of Rome, the Catholic Church has been.the ally of the kings and princes of Europe. Since the declaration of the “Infallibility of the Pope,” things have changed. Now there is war between the Kaiser of Germany and the Fisherman of the Vatican.‘ Thirty years ago a Republican Catholic paper like the Irish World could not have lived, now the claim made by it, that the Catholic Church favors democratic State rule, finds more than a hundred thousand subscribers of the ancient faith. This vers, the great Parisian ultramontane organ, the advocate of the divine right of kings, has suspended publication. Is this it. Does it mean that Pio Nono accepts the situation, by thus acknowledging thatlthe old firm of Priest and King, which has ruled Europe the past eight centuries, has dis- solved partnership forever? There is no doubt that hence- forth with the Catholic Church, in. State affairs, democracy will be the order of the day. The freedom of the land, for the land belongs to St. Peter, will be decreed. . Interest for money (and the legalization thereof), the base of our present financial system, will be condemned, and Communism, in- stituted by the first, will be indorsed by the last incumbent of the papal chair at Rome. 1 - —-'--—-————~t-40»-4 FAITH snown in FIGURES. .amna.a— Prof. A. I. Schem, in his “Statistics of the World,” lately published in London and New York, gives ‘us the fol- lowing figures on the religious proclivities of the people of America and Europe. In North and South America, out of a population of 84,500,000,’ 47,000,000 are Catholics and 30,- 000,000 are Protestants. This leaves 7,500,000 Spiritualists, Freethinkers, etc., in both continents. In Europe, out of a population of 301,000,000, 147,000,000 are Catholics, 71,800,- 000 are Protestants, and . 70,200,000 are adherents of the Creek Church. etc., in all Europe, to what Mr. Montague Tigg would call the ridiculously small figure of 2,000,000. . Harper's Weekly calls the wcrk from» which the above-quoted extract is taken, “A valuable table of the -statistics of Christianity.” faith. The philosopher who can swallow the above figures can take in Jonah, whale and all,‘ consigned to them. They forget that they are their brothers , _. one ”‘ is undoubtedly either malicious or greatly over-stated. A to be ahospital and insane asylum combined, wherein sick and well, , sane and insane, blacksand whites, all mixed together indiscriminately, day (Tuesday, Jan. 20,) the ocean cable instructs us that L’Uni ‘I the Pop.e’s answer to the Kaiser of Germany’? It looks like i. This limits the Spiritualists, Freethinkers, ‘ Well, it is valuable—to Christians who have very strong , , contended for in Taylor’s “ Diegesis.” 10 t —— WOODHULL & CLAFLIN’S WEEKLY. Jan. 31, 18,74. LIFTING THE VAIL OF SPIRITUALISM. The following picture of a Buddhist temple from “W. H. Seward’s Travels Around the World,” is presented to the readers of the WEEKLY, and their attention is specially called to the italicised passages therein, on which some comments are made, illustrating the Spiritualistic view of human religion: A “Leaving the“Ocean Banner’ (the Buddhist Temple of Honan, in ‘ Canton), we visited the ‘ Temple of the Flowery Forest.’ Its pantheon contains images not only of gods of whom the Greeks and Romans never dreamed, but of more gods than they ever worshiped. Think of five hundred colossal wooden figures, of all complexions, black, white and red, with distorted features and limbs, and dressed in purple, crim- son and gold, sitting in close order around the walls of a saloon equal to the largest in the British Museum. These are the guardian genii of China. Each is a deified apostle or saint of the religion. These figures were presented to the monastery by one of the Emperors, and perhaps all were carved by one artist. If he failed to impart a natural human expression to any among them, it must be admitted in his favor that, in their hideous distortions, no two are alike. We were kindly received by the monks. The abbot, a man of reverend mien, wears purple, a cap which might be mistaken. for C6 mttre, and a step?” in the shape of (Z crazier. ‘ As We came in advance of the evening service, they entertained us in the spacious court with delicious tea and dried fruits. The brethren showed by their conversation a vague knowledge of foreign countries. They feared that the disasters which have befallen France might en- courage Russian aggressionagainst China. They understood something of the great civil war in the United States, and rejoiced in its results. “While we were thus engaged a group of ladies, exquisitely dressed, and having the least of all feet, came into the courtaccompanied by many children.‘ This party was followed by a retinue of well-dressed servants, bearing large ornamented paper boxes, filled with votive offer- ings, paper shoes, fans, hats, etc. They were waiting until the mid- night hour, to burn these offerings in incense for the repose and cheer of deceased ancestors. Although the women made no mirthful demon- stration, they were animated and cheerful, seeming to regard the cere- mony in which they were engaged rather asa festal than a funereal one. I They made no advances to us, but showed much delight with the caresses we bestowed on their pretty children. At the service the monks‘ kindly seated Mr. Seward on a woodenbench, the only thing of the kind in the temple, in a good position to see the ceremony. The hall of worship is sixty feet square, with a lofty ceil- ing. In its centre, a gigantic, triple-carved statue, in a sitting posture, ’ . representing Buddha in his three ‘ states ’——the face looking to the left, symbolic of oblivion, or the past; that looking forward, expressive of activity, the present ,' the third, looking to the right, contemplation, or the f'zlture. The ‘Flowery 17’0rest,’ then, is a temple dedicated to at re- ligion older than our own, which presents, in a vague and misty way, two of the principles of the Christian Church ,' one, the ézteamaliort of the Su- preme ,' the other his presentation in three persons, one and indioiséble. Are these analogies merely accidental coincidences, or are they different outgrowths of the same innate ideas; or are they shadowy forms of a common revelation‘? The service consisted in a solemn, measured and devotional intonation of a long and varied liturgy; ‘ Occasionally a bell tinkled to indicate a change in the order of the prayers. At this sound the monks prostrated themselves and brought their foreheads to the ground. At other times they changed their postures toward the triune image, or walked in solemn procession around it, keeping time to a muffled drum and gong. Offerings are made of wheat, rice and millet. These being deemed now consecrated, they were, at the conclusion of the ceremony, conveyed in a tripod and scattered over the paved court of the temple, that they might be gathered by the fowls of the air, and to be saved from human profanation. The temple contains a very fine Dagoba of white marble, built over a relic of a former incarnate Buddha. Its pedestal, a lower story, is ornamented with various allegorical tab- lets, on which Buddha is represented here on a dragon,'there on a lion, and elsewhere on other animals. Heathen deities, as we come among them, seem to us to be rather impersonations of ideal conditions of human existence than spiritual conceptions of a superior order of be- ings.” A This last remark is ‘applicable .to the conceptions of deity formed by the votaries of all religions, Christianity included. There never could be a more man-like deity than the Jewish Jehovah. He is pleased, angry and jealous as the case may require. True, the Jews did not picture or model his effigy. Their testament asserted no man had ever seen him, save Moses, and he was permitted to see only “his back parts.” yiancy, “the back parts of Omnipotence,” what an idea?- To the Spiritualist the Deity is “ all face.” But there are two points in this description to which we ask special attention. First, the characteristics of the dress of the Buddhist priests, “The mitre ‘and the crozier.” Second, the foundation of the two most important prin- ciples of the Christian Church, the incarnation and the trinity, attributed, and rightly, to the far older religion of Buddha, presenting, as they do in both instances, the unity of the faith. of humanity in the forms of religion, so ably It is well that, not only here but in other countries, the world is breaking ground against the credal religions of the past, which latterly have proved only sources of misery to the peoples of the globe. There/_is no doubt but that in their day they had their, uses, but the world has outgrown the need of them, and the consequence is, that Buddhism, Brahminism, Mohammedanism and Christianity are becoming things of the past, and are falling into ruins. There is no doubt also, that there are good, vivifying principles under- lying -all these faiths, which will not die but be absorbed in the later development of Spiritualism, which is fast rising in ‘all civilized communities. Men, nations, races and re- ligions, history proves to us, are subject to the inevitable laws of rise, progress and decay, and were our. mental grasp sufficiently far-reaching, we should doubtless find that worlds and universes (as we comprehend the latter word) were subject to similar mutations. Should we grieve over such things?‘ Surely not. Our ge- ologists have shown us nature’s methods: in f the grand, pro- cessions of the ages, which they have.~d_isc,ov‘ere‘d' and ex- _ pounded. Shall we mourn that Christianity -has degenerated from the pure teachings of its founder to be a thing of hy- ~ pocrisy, of ceremonies, and of traditions? Surely not. It only shows us that ittis disintegrating in order to give place . to a better formation. Of course, in the giant changes and lrevolutions now looming up in grand majesty over all peo- ples, there will be convulsions. The clouds are already blackening the moral sky, and the lightnings of popular commotion are beginning to flash, and the thunders of pop- ular condemnation commencing to roll. Like Milton’s storm, the heavens are closing over us: “ As when two black clouds, With heaven’s artillery fraught, come rattling on Over the Caspian, then stand front to front, Hovering a/ space, till winds the signal blow To join their dark encounter in mid air.” But after the storm, what then? Why, as in the natural world, the fetid atmosphere, the lurid heavens and the with- ered herbage are replaced by purer air, bright skies and re‘- joicing trees and flowers; so, after the moral tornado which is upon us, let us hope that the rule of hypocrisy and im- morality, the merciless bickerings and brutalities of credal faiths and the degradation of woman and the masses, will be exchanged for the rule of truth and virtue, a simple trust based on scientific facts pointing us to the better develop- ment of our race; the ordainment of the ‘right of individual sovereignty, and the establishment of equality, fraternity and justice among all the peoples of the earth. __._.__..___,._.4Q.,_..¢___:______ PHOTOGRAPHS—-PRICES REDUCED. \ We have been able to make arrangements by which we can now offer our photographs——Victoria C. Woodhull’s, Tennie C. Clafiin’s and Col; J. H. Blood’s~—at fifty cents each, or three for a dollar. Thanking the many friends who "heretofore aided us in our lawsuits by purchasing at the former high rates, we trust that others who desired the pho- tographs but who did not feel able to procure them, may avail themselves of the present opportunity, and thus assist us to maintain the cause in which we have enlisted in another season scarcely less perilous than was that through which the former assistance carried us. Send for the Photos for yourselves and friends. >-«Q SHYLOCK SKINNED. The question of‘ abrogating all laws regulating the rate of interest for money has been of late carried in the affirmative in several of the States. As the recorded opinions of all our Secretaries of the Treasury, from the time of McCullough to the present period, favors such legislation, it will do no harm to air the subj ecta little in the columns of the WEEKLY. A superficial View of the question might lead the public to indorse the claim of money to increase itself by interest, simple or compound, at any rates which may be agreed upon between the parties interested; yet history teaches us that almost all civilized nations, ancient and modern, have found it expedient by law to limit simple, and in many cases to absolutely forbid compound, interest. The right of money to increase per se, or by interest, is in itself disputed by many authorities. Not a few legislators, and many philosophers and ecclesiastics, have steadily denied it. Aristotle declares that “ money is properly only a me- dium of exchange for labor, and‘ that it has no right or claim to increase except by passing directly through some form of labor. That it is the representative of wealth, and ought not to have conferred on it a power superior to that which it was invented to represent.” It is thrice condemned by the laws of Moses, and absolutely forbidden by that legis- lator between Jew and Jew. It is denounced by Mohammed in the third and thirtieth chapters of the Koran. The ancient Roman Republic forbade it in the four hundred and eleventh year of the City of Rome; The doctrines, of the Catholic Church are utterly opposed to any interest for money, and not a few of the Popes have anathematized it as a sin next to theft. The edict (for it does not merit the name of law) on which our modern money system rests, was passed in England in the reign of Elizabeth, in the year 1571. A similar edict had been passed previously by old Harry the Eighth, in 1545, but it was annulled by his successor, Edward the Sixth. In both instances the Protestant bishops, who a sat in the House of Peers, were, to ease their consciences, permitted to brand both these bills, legalizing ten per cent. usury, as “mortal sins.” The eminent Catholic historian, Charles Rollin, calls usury or interest “the most prolific source of human misery;” and the learned biblical lexi- cographer, Calmet, declares it rests on no real law-—natural, human or divine. , Admitting the right of money to increase directly through labor, the WEEKLY disputes the policy of legalizing its power to increase by interest, or per se. By such legislation money is armed and invested with a power superior to that of “wealth ” itself, which it was invented merely to represent and to serve. But this position it has attained and held for the past three-centuries. Previous to the sixteenth century it was universally condemned in Europe, and usurers or interest-takers. were severely punished by laws ecclesiastical and civil. But, notwithstanding the manifest villainy of such legislation, the institution of usury or interest has not been without its compensating benefits to mankind. It is certain that‘our present financial system, which places labor under the heels of money, has forced the intellectual and scientific powcrsbf the few to the highest pitch of excellence. This would be. praiseworthy were it _unalloyed;i but, alas! it has been dearly purchased by the deterioration of the masses of mankind. I In Great Britain the army standard has been decreased twice inthe last twenty years; and in,Mas,sa- chusetts, during the war of the rebellion, more than half the drafted men were found unfit to bear arms. So great is this declension that the last census proves it to have affected, more especially in the cities, the natural increase of com- munities. In New York the annual deaths always very largely exceed the births, and nearly one-third of the married couples are childless. It is true that this sorrowful state of things appears to proceed from what may be termed natural causes, but really it ought to be attributed to the dreadful results of financial pressure upon the people. It is certain that the dead laborer, money, whose power to oppress is capable of indefinite extension, and which power has been most unscrupulously extended, demands and receives so great a share of the annual returns of the proceeds of the labors of the workers, that enough is not left to satisfy the bare needs of its last-served living competitors. Laborers are only beginning to perceive how deeply their interests are affected by false financial legislation. If money were not armed with the power of law, there would be no need of restraining it with ,the curb of usury laws. The proper way is to deprive it both of the power and the curb. Except when money is used as a medium of exchange for labor, and is balanced by a labor equivalent, it ought to have no status in any court of law. Two centuries ago the first marine insurance company, the “ Hand-in-Hand ”p of London, sued a party for debt. The case was tried in the Court of Kings Bench, in that city. The judges questioned the plaintiffs as to what equivalents they had rendered for the moneys claimed. The plaintiffs’ attorneys answered, “Mental ease and security.” They were non-suited, on the ground that “mental ease and security were too intangible commodities to be recognized as equivalents by the court.’ In the old mercantile forms, before so many patent ways. of robbing the public for a living were instituted, there was a mighty meaning hidden in the two simple words demanded in all such forms, viz. : “value received.” VVhen our Secretaries of the Treasury come before the people, as they have done for the past twelve years, demand- ing the withdrawal of the usury laws of the several States, the laborers should couple that demand with the abrogation of all laws enforcing the claims of usurers, and second it. There is no reason why the people’s law should be the poo- dle—dog of the financier. Consider the cost of the legislation in favor of “money.” Probably ni-ne—tenths of the volumi- nous and complicated laws which burden our statute books and ourselves were enacted to protect and sustain it. Were (what is incorrectly termed) the “credit system” annihilated, and loaned money not recoverable by law, then it would be just to free the money-loaner: from the trammels of usury lawsand leave in his hands the natural power of oppression. In such case it might be surmised that money would rarely be loaned. What then? It would be compelled to seek direct increase through one of the ten thousand channels of labor, and in so doing would destroy middlemen, and bring” workers face to face with their employers. Labor would only have to pay A, instead of paying A, B, C and D, as is too often now the case. This is a consummation devoutly to be wished. This last statement may seem to be irrele- vant, but the advocates of so great a change as the repeal of the usury laws must be prepared to face all the consequen- . ces of their motion. They will do well also to remember that the only thing which sustains usury or interest for money, outside of the counting-room of the trader and finan- cier, is the “silence” not the consent of the Protestant clergy. Prudence naturally prevents many of our theolo- gians from discussing the question, though all of them know that usury or interest is a crime more largely testified against in the Bible than any other. But probably there are some who will not be so restrained. Let, then, those who agitate, this question beware, lest in the siftingexamination to which it will be exposed, the repeal of the usury laws should effect as great a change in popular opinion on ‘the subject of “ money,” as the repeal of the Missouri Compromise effected among us on the subject of “slavery.” —-———---9-40»-4 OUR PRESENT SOCIAL CONDITION. The present state of the marriage market is thus ruefully depicted under the ominous heading of “Wives at Dis- count” in Harpers’ Bazaar. It is, indeed, a sad description of the grievous condition ingwhich the upper ranks of society find themselves, under the melancholy legal monogamic sys- tem to which they are sacrificed. After deploring the - scarcity of “marrying men,” as they are termed, the article continues thus: “The blessed instincts, old"as human nature, of love and fidelity, of fatherhood and motherhood, of family and home, are just as strong and as steadfast at the root of the human heart to-day as when it first sprung from thelove of the Father of all. Yet the world beholds the unnatural sight of women arraying themselves in the garniture of fashion to de- light the eyes of men, and of men refusing to be delighted; of large companies of women congregating for pleasure, and of men refusing to join them; instead, going off alone to seek happiness in their own way and by themselves. Now we all know that it is natural for men and W0- men to seek pleasure in each other‘s society. If they do otherwise, it is because some abnormal condition has arisen between themto keep them apart. Marriage in youth, formerly the rule, is fast becoming the excep -' .tion.- Once a young man’s first ambition was to begin life with a wife and home. Together they Worked to earn a competency, to educate their children, and to go up and down the hill of life together. To-day our country towns and villages are emptied of young men, who have gone forth into the great world to seek their fortunes. _ These same towns and villages. are crowded with unmarried women, growing old, aimless, joylessand alone. Our cities swarm with young and middle- aged men, more or less successful in every avenue of life, who slowly, by degrees, have-‘given up the, idea of marriage altogether. Many of these are stereotyped attendants upon fashionable ladies, chronic “ soci- ,~u. Jan. 31, 1874. woonn,ULL & C"LA‘j‘FLlN"S WEEKLY- ’ ~ 11 . ety men.” Many more are social Bohemians. More and more men and women are seeking their pleasures, their pursuits, their lives,‘ apart. It is unnatural; being unnatural, the causes which produce such a state of of affairs must be unhealthy and reprehensible. Are women in no wise to blame? We think that they are. To a certain extent a mutual an- tagonism has grown up between the sexes. It springs from over-asser- tion and selfishness in both. It can have no power ‘L0 destroy ultimately their eternal relation. But it has power to alienate their faith in and mutual dependence on each other. Many “advancec ” women forget that there can be no true progress, save in the company of, not in opposi- tion to, men. Fashionable women forget that in ten thousand cases their extravagant display and exorbitant demands so alarm the very men whom they seek to please, that they make marriage and home with them im- possible. Thousands of men have come to believe that marriage to a woman means only afat banker’s book, a great house, cquipage, splen- dor, extravagance, money. Thus they say if they cannot have what their hearts call love in marriage, they will have what they can get out- side of it. Many of them become ravening wolves, stealing and feasting upon the lambsof society. Theypturn into trificrs o\rglibertines, accord- ing to their natures. They makeiand unmake unhallowed transient re- lations. They infest boarding-houses, lodgings and clubs, and go down into lonely, homeless, buttonless old age. All this because wives are at a discount.” This is a melancholy and painful description of the pres- ent state of the sexual relations of upper-tendom. It fortifies the WEEKLY in its determination to change it. Vlfhefi men and women hate one another, as the above article specifies, for it declares that “ a mutual antagonism has grown up between the sexes,” surely it is not wrong to endeavor to remove such antipathy, and counsel them to love one another. To that end the WEEKLY has endeavored to point out “the causes which produce such a sad state of affairs,” agreeing fully with the Baear that “they are unhealthy and reprehensible.” For this act, the proprietors of the WEEKLY and many other true women, and men also, have long braved the world’s reproach, but they intend to continue to brave it, feeling assured that the work theyare engaged in is one necessary to the welfare, if not to the continued duration, of civilized humanity; if the term “civilized ” can rightly be applied to so melancholy a condition of human existence as that drawn by the Baear. I 0 VICTORIA c.woonHULL IN THE iwE’s“T'. [From the St. Joseph (£310.) Herald, Jan. 10.] VICTORIA WOODHULL. A LARGE AUDIENCE IN TooTLE’s OPERA HoUsE—A STRONG, RADICAL AND SENSIBLE PROTEST AGAINST THE sHAMs or THE DAY. I Tootle’s Opera House was well filled last night with citi- zens of St. Joseph and vicinity, who were attracted thither by the fame of the lecturer, Victoria C. Woodhull. The au- dience was composed of our most solid and sensible citizens, every one of whom,we venture to assert, was most agreeably disappointed. Let us say, in the I outset, that the lecture was oneof the most vigorous, sensible, though radi- cal protests against the shams of the nineteenth century ever listened to by a St. Joseph audience. Not a word was ut- tered during the hour and a half of Mrs. Woodhull’s lecture that every man and woman in the nation could not have lis- tened to with the utmost propriety and with undeniable profit. Those who expected to be shocked were egregiously disappointed. , We saw several lawyers and citizens in the dress-circle from Andrew, Platte and Holt counties, while our own city contributed its full quota of bankers and solid men, whose faces are rarely seen in that locality. At precisely o’clock, the young daughter of Mrs.Wood- ‘ hull appeared upon the stage, and withremarkably clear and distinct enunciation recited a poem of considerable length, which was very well received. I Immediately afterward, Mrs. Woodhull appeared, and was greeted with applause. Mrs. Woodhull is a “good looking ” lady, decidedly, but not one. of the namby-pamby painted beauties of whom poets sing and gay young clerks delight- edly dream. She is natural, self-possessed and earnest. Her face is good looking because it is an earnest and intelligent one, and such countenances are so rare among the hot-house plants of our time as to be an interesting study to observing men and wompn. Her remarks upon the present federal system were exceedingly bitter, and when she poured hot shot into the President, Congress and the men in office throughout the nation, the democrats present were wild with delight; but when she stated that no good could be ac- complished by a political change, “ for a change of men would be simply a change in thieves,” we noticed that our conserva- tive friends were very quiet, a few blowing their noses and looking red in the face, and the rest of them looking de- murely up into the gallery to see who was meant. She charged the President and each member of the Cabinet with pretty much everything that Democratic papers have charged in their most insane attack; but she declared that they were legitimately exhibiting the natural results of a rotten system of government. She said that the oflice holders so manipu- lated monetary affairs in 1872, that. had Jesus Christ been running against Ulysses S. Grant, the man of sorrows would have been defeated.” Her protest against the spurious religion of the clay was‘ ‘positively terrific. Said she: “ What would your Christians of this generation say if Christ were to come among you, walk through the streets with ragged, dirty, barefooted chil- dren clinging to him, visiting greasy fishermen, harlots and sinners, and the miserable and poverty-stricken people of your cities? Worild they fall down and worship him? Would they adore him? No! If he attempted to walk into one of their lofty and magnificent temples of prayer and praise, they would send for a policeman and put him out.”, He said, “ Sufier little children to come unto me,” but the lec- turer opined that he wouldebe forced to say, “SufferZegal ' children only to come,” if he’ met the requirements of the , strait-laced Christians of this time. . She arraigned the church for nearly all the evils of the hour; for no President or other prominent ofiicer could be elected but by the aid of the church; he must have the influ- ence of the members. She charged that women were the cement that held the churches together—poor, loving souls, who probably have no love or comfort at home, turn -intothe churches for companionship, love and sympathy, and the ministers are often compelled to furnish spiritual and phys- ical consolation to these weaklings of the flock. She had been in a jail, and had seen women standing in the water up to their ankles all night long, and this, too, under the shadow of one of the largest churches, and in the sound of the prayers of those devout Christians. ' She earnestly entreated every woman to observe the old Greek motto, “Know thyself 1” She insisted that there must be truth and knowledge between mothers and their offspring, and thus would crime, prostitution and misery be avoided. Her remarks on this topic were very forcible, and her strictures upon that false modesty or delicacy which prevents parents from preparing their children for the battle of life before them, were not only timely and truthful, but known to be so by every person present. women to enable her to go on with the reform [she has en- tered upon. Large numbers of the audience purchased copies of her speeches, which were for sale in pamphlet form, and many subscribed for WOODHULL 8t CLAELIN’s WEEKLY. As a lecturer, Mrs. Woodhull is a success. We do not at- tempt even a sketch of her remarks. She is an excellent elocutionist, gesturing mainly with her eyes and head, occa- sionally stamping out a sentence and punctuating it with a nervous shake of the knowledge-box_;.and she tells more plain truth in one lecture than our citizens will be apt to hear elsewhere in a lifetime. Her lecture was pronounced by all who heard it oneof the ablest and best which has been delivered here. We know that many men and women were deterred from attending last evening lest she should say something which they would blush to hear. Mrs. Woodhull told the truth about such people. Only a weak mind blushes. to hear the truth when uttered in decent English. The strong mind, the clear, vigorous intellect looks Nature squarely in the face, and recognizes truth as something especially adapted to its wants. . [From the St. Joseph, Ma, Gazette, Jan. 10.]. AN INTERVIEW WITH THIS SINGULAR WOMAN—HER LECTURE LAST NIGHT. Say what you please of the subject of this article, she is a woman of power, and cannot be ignored. She “ will not down,” and thecommon-sense method would be to meet her squarely, full in the face. All efforts to ‘suppress her have proved abortive, and have only tended to increase her noto- riety. She is an ocean bay alive with the stir of whales, and whoever attempts her capture is sure to get splashed. \ Yesterday we called upon Mrs. VV.§ at the Pacific Hotel, and was received by her in an easy and vivacious manner. Conversation at once turned upon national topics, and she manifested a perfect familiarity with every question of im- portance now agitating the American people. The impres- She closed with an appeal for aid from earnest menancl . sion quite frequently entertained that she has concentrated , plause and intense satisfaction among the juniors at this dig at their governors, who, they thought, were served about right] , ‘ We hardly need repeat that her doctrines on this subject are the most radical of the radical--Free Love in its broad- est sense; which, however, does not mean promiscuousness, as many people seem to insist that it should. The present system of legal marriage is the object of her special attack, and she charges upon the legal violations. of and outrages against love, committed under cover of legal matrimony, the major portion .of the unchasteness, misery. and pollution existing outside of it. As a lecturer, Mrs. Woodhull is a. decided success.‘ She is possessed of a fine voice, and when she paces the platform and stamps out her terrific sentences, the audience are elec- trifiedup to the highestpitch. Mrs. Woodhull lectures again to—night, on “The Social Question,” and the house will be packed from pit to ceiling. [From the Leacem/no/th (Kan) Daily Oommercial of January 11.] THE SOCIAL EVIL HANDLED UPON THE ROSTRUM-—VICTORIA MAKES SOME STRANGETHINGS PUBLIC. Last evening, as per announcement, Mrs. Victoria C.Wood- hull delivered a lecture at the Opera House. There was a very large audience indeed in attendance. The first part of the lecture dealt with the subject of po- litical reform, and among what was said by the speaker there was a great deal that might be highly comndended. Mrs. Woodhull told a great many truths concerning the male prostitutes, whom she_ insistedshould be punished equally with the females. and concerning public men, whom she accused of being largely the supporters of bawds and of infamous houses. ' ' ~ Mrs. Woodhull is about thirty-four years of age, but seen at aydistance she looksyounger. She is of medium height and rather slight, although by no means scrawny; has a good form, erect and firm; her features are regular and of the aquiline type; eyes dark-blue and very expressive, and when in speaking she gets thoroughly roused,‘they are flashingly excited in conversation or speaking to an audience there comes a flush upon her checks which is of the hectic order; her hair, which is alight brown, is worn short, and carelessly arranged; her forehead is high and broad, and her, whcle head and face indicate more than ordinary intellectual and mental power. Physically, she looks a superior woman. Mentally, she seems to be such. ' MISCELI.ANE‘CUS. ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA. I A PARODY 0N W. W. sToEY’s “ CLEOPATRA ."' CANTO I. I am dying, Antony, dying For my panther of the Nile; My heart is hot with passion For the gloryof thy smile. about all her information and ideas in a lecture or-two, and relies for reputation upon these studied efforts, is entirely erroneous. She is ready at all times toidefend ‘herself against attack at any point. And not only that, but she constantly acts upon the aggressive, and although she listens respectfully she can but illy conceal the innate’ force that apparently longs for expression in words. The intense activity of her brain is remarkable. She is a woman of culture and large experience. ~ It were useless to give the details of her lecture last night. The ‘woman is evidently’ in earnest, and is endowed with tragic strength and wonderful fluency. I [From the Daily Times, Leavenworth, Kan, January 11, 1874.] HOW SHE LAID DOWN THE DOCTRINE AT THE OPERA HOUSE LAsT NIGHT. he The Opera House was well filledilast night with an audi- ence attracted there by the name and fame of Victoria C. Woodhull. Previous to the appearance of Mrs. Woodhull, her daughter appeared and delivered a lengthy poem on the “ Coming Crisis,” which was well received. Then the veritable Woodhull herself, manuscript in hand, walked gracefully from the side scenes on the left of the stage, and commenced her lecture. For the first half hour, politics was the inspiring theme, and the principles and propositions laid down were fearful to contemplate. In words delivered with terrible emphasis’, she hurled blow after blow at the present system of govern- ment, and cast many a slur at the administration. The re- ligious fanatics received a dose which was not easily swal- lowed. The money kings and railroad autocrats received her ‘blessing in a “way not to be misunderstood. Siashing right and left, she cut to ‘pieces and held up to public view the corrupt rings and upholders of oppression all over the country. But the political part of her lecture was as nothing when she struck the topic of social reform. Throw- torrent of eloquent and impassioned words. Nothing can describe the terrible earnestness with which she hurled back the taunts and jeers with which she has been so abundantly favored of late. ‘ A ’ She earnestly entreated every woman to observe the old Greek motto, “ Know thyself.” She insisted that there must spring, and thus would crime, prostitution and misery be avoided. Her remarks on this topic were very forcible, and r her strictures upon that false modestygor delicacy which prevents parents from preparing their children for the bat- tle of life before them, were not only timely and truthful, but known to be so by every person present. ‘She told wives that there were 2,500,000 prostitutes in the land, supported by two and a half millionsof men—not the young men, for they have not money enough to support themselves [ap- plause by the elderly portion of the audience], but the hoary- headed old villains, husbands and fathers. .[Thunderous ap- Red blood is rushing madly From heart to finger tips, And Ilong to feel thee pressing Fierce kisses on my lips. Ah! how well do lrcmember, ' As spicy gales divine, _ When thy tawny beard swept o’er me, Like odors of rich wine! ‘ The hot air was thick with incense, As the crimson setting sun H Smote on the air of evening ‘ When the azure day was done. In the heat of passion slaying, Glad, glorious was thy smile, As you wound your arms around me, Like the serpent of the Nile; The white lotus breathing o’er us, Wild poppies all blood red, The creamy, perfumed lily, Made sweet our nuptial bed. The tall and feathery palm tree Spread its green mat ’bove our head, And we slept the sleep of infants Whom mother-arms oerspread. The wild, fleet steeds of Araby Rushed swift, unheeded by. All their trackless footstepslfilling With amber dust the sky. What cared we for the rushing Of mighty, swift simoom, Or cimeter of Moorish band That golden afternoon. ing aside her manuscript, ‘she launched forth in a perfect - be truth and knowledge between mothers and their ofi‘- - The wild herds of the Tartar / Might roam till evening glooms, Unconsciously we slept and dreamed, ’Mid ambient perfumes. CANTO II. Now the level, sanded desert Our twin so/uls far divide, _ 1 , V Yet the ancient Roman galley Floats on the sluggish tide. Then come to me, my panther, Come swifter than the wind, And fieeter thanzthe fiery steed, Come/to" your cub, of Ind. Let us spjor‘t:in ‘darkest jungle, 0’er tint6.d:‘sands_.far roam; ‘ In dusky shade-_of Tamerisk Seek out the parrot’s home. ‘Now, my pantheifbold and fearless, Come hold me with your “claws, ' ' All passionate limbs enfold I 7 In your saffrcni, velvétvpawsi ‘ ' l S“ A V ‘ Maythe hush, bland airs of evening — - - ~ With love our hearts infuse, . Cooling our blood at midnight, “ [In softest Paphlan_dews,. , -I The; distant Orientsmilqing, eloquent. She is rather inclined to paleness except when S , A I A vvo,o,nnoLL a CI.A’1?‘LI,N’S vvnnrrtr. jan. 31, 1874. Her attar of roses sweep Over our bosoms, enthrilling "The dreams of ravishing sleep. ’ The vision is frenzy, ’_tis madness. Where lingers my Antony, say? Ye gods, if longer he tarry, I will his Octavia slay. Unmoor me the swiftest galley, On, on to the (Roman States; Go tell my well-starred warriors The queen, Cleopatra, waits. Unbind me these golden tresses, And hand me the robe of state, Quickly man me the-trusty barges—— I seek for my panther mate. ,- Loose from its bondage my ensign, Let its crimson folds overus fall; Float it over the starry crescent That hangs by the casemate wall.‘ CANTO III. From old Egypt send my heralds, Tell them Cleopatra waits, With her mighty armed warriors, , Outside the city gates. ' V Bid them open wide the portals, Let her look on tower and dome; Cleopatra seeks her Antony ’ Amid the flames of Rome. Minions, have my words no meaning? I date the wisdom of fate To find my Antony‘s wooing Is made in the Roman State; That he dailies with pale Octavia,’ Forgetful offlkingdom and crown, Or wars with the base-hearted Caesar, And finds but a world’s renown. Hush! Read but the cruel story, '1‘hat over the desert flew; How all was lost in the battle- Himself my Antony slew. Then let not the cruel triumvir Dare his memory to defile, I Or mock the matchless splendor Of our loves beside the Nile. The dark Roman legion’s banner . Now floats above his head, Ah! no more the Senates triumph, For my Antoriy is dead. Then take down my satin ensign. And befurl .my silken sail; For the flinty heart of Caesar ( Has made my life to fail. List, my tawny Indianbeauty, Now go seek the fatal asp; . Let me hold its rainbow collars Within my nerveless grasp. My fading Egypt, long farewell, The Styx breaks on my view; ,I come, my glorious Antony, Rome, Egypt, gods, adieu! CANTO iv. A wail comes o’er the desert, Echoing adown the Nile, 0’ertoppin g tower and «citadel, Sweeping o’er rank and file. ’.Tis a shout, but not of battle, From tent to Delta green, _ ' And old E ypt’s well-scarred warriors VVeep for their lovely queen. Robe her in royal purple, From looms of Tyrian dye, , On her slender molded ankles White silver sandals tie. With seed pearl thickly broider The satins of her bed; And to old Tiberls shore proclaim, Our peerless queen is dead. Lay her golden, jeweled tiara On her amber-tinted hair, To glint, like morning sunshine, The thick palatial air. How paled her glorious beauty, As glistening iceberg cold; ‘ White lips, all mute and motionless As Egypt’s sphynx of old. - ‘ Now let the Roman chariots In martial line defile; All heads bowed down like bulrush / Beside the afliuent Nile; The leagured hosts of Caesar, Hot with victorious lusts, May trail beside the pale dead queen Their eagles in the dust. But let no royal pageant, No warriors gather round, For the blood-red flag of Egypt No other queen has found. Grim; dusky, Moorish minions To‘ Rome the passage bars; Have scattered Cleopatrgvs hosts Remote as beltless stars. ~ BROOKLYN, Dec. 10, 1873. * .._.—__.- To the Editor of the Weeklyl—-I have seen the report you have published of the doingsand sayings of the Chicago Con- vention, and I take pleasure in saying that in the publication of such areport, so full, so accurate and impartial as it is, you have done a work worthy of high commendation. Some ould not be at that /Convention either for want of time or ‘means; butnow such of them asmay choose ‘to read can al- most imagine that they werethere; and though they may not attain whatever there may be in personal presence-—in the eye and the ear, and in soul-communion»-yet whatever of principle has been evolved, they may well discover and understand, and also, as 1 hope, they may profit/thereby. But I discover some things in your editorials pertaining 139 that Convention, and particularly in the issue of October 18, V \ H,»-. while discoursing upon “hypocrisy,” so much at variance with the truth, and so unjust to the persons involved, and especially your humble servant, that I consider they should not be passed unnoticed. You say, “ I/Ve may learn that they [the minority] are in favor of being right in principlebut wrong in practice.”_ “ They each and all said it [the resolu- tion] was not true—even going so far as to ‘defend hypocrisy in the abstract.” * * * “ Those who have bad princi- ples, and who live them, thus become examples of warning I to the world, instead of examples for justice, as Judge Hol- brook argued.” “All his arguments were based upon the old theologicalidea of the depravity of human nature, which makes the race inclined to follow after the base instead of after the good.” ' . V Now Ihave this to say (and I propose to say it with due deference), that all this, so far as any fact is set forth con- cerning me, is exceedingly false, of which the proof is very clear, as I will attempt to show. _ i The words of Article 9 referred to are these: “That hypocrisy is the most dangerous element of the pres_ent civilization, and the individuals who profess one system of morals and practice another are the most dangerous class of society.” a ‘o - It may be remarked that the latter clause defines what is meant by theword. hypocrisy in the first clause; and the air of the resolution (in itself quite, or essentially, abstract) is directed to those who maintain a high order of principles, according to their own view, and yet practice what they condemn—more particularly those who condemn, or affect to condemn, before the world the principles of social freedom and yet practice them. Now, my methods of proof that the assertions made con- cerning me are very false, are twofold. The one ‘is, that in tuitionally, axiomatically, it is self-evident truth that I did not say that I “was in favor of jbeing right in principle but wrong in practice ”—the short (if which is, that -I “ was in favor of being wrong in practice,” and thatl “have not argued for those who have bad principles and who live them as examples for practice.” Youi.-have said further that “ my arguments were based upon the old theological idea of the depravity of human nature.” You may give what force you choose to your statement; and, as you do, I present to ‘you this dilemma. I should be very sorry to think that there were any of your readers that would not find intuitionally, as a self-evident truth, that I never “ was in favor of being right in principle but wrong in practice,” or in “favorof being wrong in practice,” or “defended hypocrisy in the abstract,” and that I have “ argued for those who have bad principles and who live them as examples for practice.” Now, if they do so find against me, I submit that they find that theological dogma of human depravity very true as to myself; and if they do not so find as to myself, then they must find it true of the one that has asserted, or would assert, such things of me without the most positive proof. My other method is to refer to the record that you have made of what I said——a part of which, at the risk of. being tedious, Iwill quote: “I do not go for hypocrisy by any means. I do not advocate that a man is justified in advo- cating good principles and then practicing evil. It is right that he should teach good principles and follow them.” * * “ Precept goes as far as example. Teach by your precept and teach by your example,” etc., etc. , Without repeating more I will call‘ attention to the fact that I was contending against the exact truthfulness bf the proposition that hypocrisy, so defined, was the most dan- gerous; or, that is to say aflirmatively, that the man that is wrong in his principles and his teachings and wrong in prac- tice is more dangerous than the man who is right in his principles and his teachings, but yet wrong in his practice, and would do more injury to individuals and to society. Now, let me ask in all candor, is there, anything I have said or done in all this that justifies you in placing me before the world in the attitude, either as a reasoner or a moralist, that you have? - Now, right here, as confessions are called for lately, it may perhaps be in order to confess to‘ a certain trifling peccadillo solely within my own knowledge, though others may have had strong suspicions of it. I called the above proposition -——“ to be right in principle and wrong in practice is better than to be wrong in principle and practice both”—-as “an ‘aphorism in scienc e and truth——a‘ self-evident truth;” “the sentiment of common sense,” etc. As a self-evident propo- sition no argument could make it more evident, and those who were not convinced, from an intuitional point of view, that the sum of two quantities, two errors, was greater than one alone, and “a portion greater than the one minus the ' other, could not be convinced by argument; and so. as much for the fun of the thing as otherwise, I briefly aired the solecism for the amusement of those who‘ had not made so great an investment in fanaticism that they could not see the point; and the gross misuse of the superlative adjective most, where but the positive or the comparative could find its proper place. ‘Whatever of penance, 1 ought to endure for all this, I will endeavor to submit to without complaint. I am prompted to remark here in this connection, for the purpose of more fully meeting this effort to place certain ones in a false position, that Mr. Chase, on taking up the re- frain, fell, in some degree, into the same error, either wit- tingly or unwittingly. Much that he said was well enough, as that the hypocrisy of the age should be condemned; but in so far as his remarks were based upon the supposed idea that any mere advocating the propriety of believing one the- ory and practicing another, he was imputing false premises and falselogic to somebody, and hence in error. The true logician meets his opponent, and either confronts his pre- mises, as he states them for himself, or his conclusions there- from. In logic, it is “ one of the most damnable things ex- tant,” in this or any age, to misrepresent the position of your opponent. Who is there that cannot, before his own coterie of admiring and trusting friends, beat his adversary, if he will only be permitted to set up his premises for him, and set them up so that they are ready to fall. Even the “veriest one—horse-preacher can do that, To say that you should not , . ?‘-‘hi’.-:.‘§£7s2!*a’»‘.:fc>.~‘.t:%:»°. . -' " ' " ' ,“it is one of the 1and—marks of progression.” practice what your conscience condemns is but an aphor- ism in the matter of morals; but to maintain that the advo- cacy of the right with the strength and willingness of the spirit, though failing to practice it through the weakness of the flesh, is worse than both to advocate and practice the wrong. Now to this Shakespeare would say, ‘* Oh, most lame and impotent conclusion.” When Mr. Chase says, “In the name of God, put up a proposition that will draw out the devil that lurks in every man and woman,” I think every true Spiritualist will say Amen, and will also lament that such a proposition had not been put up in the_ first instance, and been kept up till the present time; and’ their idea no doubt is, that if it had been done, and had been effectual, as it might have been, Spiritualism to-day would have been like the “ eagle towering in his pride of flight,” and not like the duck waddling along with drooping feathers after a storm. If Shalsespeare says (as he gives him credit for): “Who one thing think and another tell, My soul abhors as the gates of hell,” He must have said, for his head was level, His soul abhorred as the very devil Him who was wrong in every part, Both in the head and in the heart; Corrupt in principle and deed, His sins accordant to his creed; . So boldly recreant to all good, As not to claim it when he could; And never give the honor due Of feigned resemblance to the true; And as the devil is worse than hell, As all our reverend preachers tell (And surely they must lgiow full well), Then I am right, and Chase is wrong, Which is the inference of my song; ‘ And Willie Shakespeare nails it doubly strong. One of the speakers of the minority, a gentleman of great modesty and good sense, somewhat dazed in the presence of so many intellectual ladies, (as why should he not be ‘B3 rather misconceiving for the moment the practical meaning of the word hypocrisy, as it was up for discussion, gave to it the position that it occupies as an evidence of the advance of so- ciety from barbarism to civilization, from a low to a higher, from the wrong to the right. As such in its primitive sense, hypocrisy. is truly an evidence of growing virtue. When public sentiment becomeszso strong against hitherto unre- strained crime that murder no longer stalks abroad at noon- day as heretofore, but conceals itself and withdraws to dark places and secret methods, then the right is gaining ground, and this hypocrisy is the evidence and the measure of it; and so on with every crime and every wrong to the end of the calendar. Hence it is true in this sense, as it was said, that “hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue,” and In this sense there is no limit that can be prescribed to it. The politeness of those people in convention, while discussing and condemn- ing, would be an affront to the rude barbarian for his con- cealment. One might suggest that the resolution itself is by- pocritical, if hypercriticism in other people’s hypocrisy be- comes the rage. It is more or less than it reads and is in- tendedto be so. Hypocrisy is pronounced to be, or is ad- mitted to be, an “element of the present civilization.” Then you make it a constituent and a cause of civilization. If we have in fact a civilization, can sucha dangerous thing occupy so high a place in forming it? Is it not rather as I have in- timated, a land-mark only of our progression and not an ele- ment? Then “the professing one system of morals and practi- cing another.” Have we different systems, and what are they? Why not name them fully, so that we can vote understand- ingly? And is one system better than and variant from an- other? If not, how does it appear that there is so much danger? And if one is better than the other, suppose one advocates the worst and practices the best, is it still danger- ous? Therefore, the Free-Love Convention pronounces its actingchairman. the veteran Coonley, the most dangerous man in the world—for he declared publicly to the Conven- tion that he advocated social freedom and practiced monog- amy. This effort to dignify hypocrisy with a superhuman greatness, and then to overcome it by a hypocritical resolu- tion, abstract, general pointless, and so far as its meaning can be guessed, not true in our mathematics, logic or morals, will have the same practical effect as the resolutions of those certain ones that we have read of, at least in poetry, who “resolved and re-resolved and did the same.” But this communication is getting to be too lengthy, and yet I must notice a little further on in the editorial, that you say, “The solution of the action of the minority in opposing, cloak to the ‘lives, which they live.” Is this thrust in the dark worthy the professed gospel of social freedom and its lead